2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron oxidation and precipitation in a simulated heap leaching solution in a Leptospirillum ferriphilum dominated biofilm reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, both pH and temperature play a key role on iron concentration (and thus Eh values) due to ferric iron precipitation as jarosite. Although pH values below 2.0 are recommended to prevent jarosite formation (Pina et al, 2010), its precipitation is kinetic controlled, thus at high temperatures, such as those applied during leaching with moderate thermophiles the precipitation rate is increased (Daoud and Karamanev, 2006; Ozkaya et al, 2007; van Hille et al, 2010). Hence, jarosite precipitation was significant even at pH below 2.0 in the current work, thus controlling iron solubility and explaining the above-mentioned results (Figure 3B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, both pH and temperature play a key role on iron concentration (and thus Eh values) due to ferric iron precipitation as jarosite. Although pH values below 2.0 are recommended to prevent jarosite formation (Pina et al, 2010), its precipitation is kinetic controlled, thus at high temperatures, such as those applied during leaching with moderate thermophiles the precipitation rate is increased (Daoud and Karamanev, 2006; Ozkaya et al, 2007; van Hille et al, 2010). Hence, jarosite precipitation was significant even at pH below 2.0 in the current work, thus controlling iron solubility and explaining the above-mentioned results (Figure 3B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this period, DO sharply decreased from 2.50 to 0.25 mg/L and accordingly effluent Fe 2+ concentration increased from 800 to 9,500 mg/L. Due to the oxygen mass transfer limitation, Fe 2+ conversion was 55% during this period [13].…”
Section: Fluidized Bed Reactor Performancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thereafter, the FBR was operated at HRT between 1.5 and 5 h at pH 2 (Regime-3). Detailed information on the FBR and process variables has been reported by Ozkaya et al [13].…”
Section: Fluidized Bed Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilms cost the USA literally billions of dollars every year in energy losses, equipment damage, product contamination, and medical infections . But biofilms can also offer huge potential for bio‐remediating hazardous waste sites, bio‐filtering municipal and industrial water and waste water, forming bio‐barriers to protect soil and ground water from contamination, as well as heap leaching .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%