Iron status and obesity-related traits: A two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

Abstract

BackgroundThe association between iron status and obesity-related traits is well established by observational studies, but the causality is uncertain. In this study, we performed a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate the causal link between iron status and obesity-related traits.MethodsThe genetic instruments strongly associated with body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio (WHR), serum ferritin, serum iron, transferrin saturation (TSAT), and total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) were obtained through a series of screening processes from summary data of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of European individuals. We used numerous MR analytical methods, such as inverse-variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and maximum likelihood to make the conclusions more robust and credible, and alternate methods, including the MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran’s Q test, and leave-one-out analysis to evaluate the horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneities. In addition, the MR-PRESSO and RadialMR methods were utilized to identify and remove outliers, eventually achieving reduced heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy.ResultsThe results of IVW analysis indicated that genetically predicted BMI was associated with increased levels of serum ferritin (β: 0.077, 95% CI: 0.038, 0.116, P=1.18E-04) and decreased levels of serum iron (β: -0.066, 95% CI: -0.106, -0.026, P=0.001) and TSAT (β: -0.080, 95% CI: -0.124, -0.037, P=3.08E-04), but not associated with the levels of TIBC. However, the genetically predicted WHR was not associated with iron status. Genetically predicted iron status were not associated with BMI and WHR.ConclusionsIn European individuals, BMI may be the causative factor of serum ferritin, serum iron, and TSAT, but the iron status does not cause changes in BMI or WHR.

The causal correlation between gastroesophageal reflux disease and chronic widespread pain: a bidirectional mendelian randomization study

“…To prevent inclusion bias from observational studies that neglect to omit mutual factors, relevant confounders were eliminated before to the two-sample MR analysis in the current investigation, and GERD and CWP were included as distinct outcomes. The degree of evidence from observational studies and the superiority of MR analysis (38) meant that confounders had less of an impact on the current study’s conclusions. Despite the fact that there is heterogeneity among the instrumental factors for positive MR, IVW’s random effects model ensures that the results are reliable despite the heterogeneity.…”

The Relationship Between autoimmune disorders and intracranial aneurysms in East Asian and European populations: A bidirectional and multivariable two-sample mendelian randomization study

“…We categorized six ADs into groups based on connective tissue disease, in ammatory bowel disease, and thyroid disease, conducting MVMR1 to discern the independent effects of each AD on IA. Additionally, MVMR2 was executed for each exposure, encompassing alcohol consumption, smoking, and systolic blood pressure, to avoid the in uence of confounding factors [15]. To further fortify our analysis, a reverse MR was conducted to counteract the potential effects of reverse causality.…”