Iron tetrasulfophthalocyanine immobilized on metal organic framework MIL-101: synthesis, characterization and catalytic properties

Abstract

Iron tetrasulfophthalocyanine (FePcS) has been irreversibly inserted into nanocages of the metal organic framework MIL-101 to give a hybrid material FePcS/MIL-101 which demonstrated a superior catalytic performance in the selective oxidation of aromatic substrates with (t)BuOOH than homogeneous FePcS.

Highly Selective H2O2‐Based Oxidation of Alkylphenols to p‐Benzoquinones Over MIL‐125 Metal–Organic Frameworks

“…Similar effects were suggested for encapsulation of iron tetrasulfophthalocyanine (ca. 17 × 17 Å) into cages of Cr‐MIL‐101 (15 × 16 Å windows) 17. Finally, we should also take into account that destruction of the MIL‐125 framework under the conditions of liquid‐phase oxidation with aqueous H 2 O 2 (see below) could be, at least, partially responsible for the unusually high catalytic activity of the Ti‐MOFs in the selective oxidation of the alkyl‐substituted phenols.…”

Facile synthesis of palladium nanoparticles encapsulated in amine-functionalized mesoporous metal–organic frameworks and catalytic for dehalogenation of aryl chlorides

“…After the catalysis workup, there is no detectable leaching of chromium to solution because of the highstability MIL-101(Cr)-NH 2 (Cr < 0.1 ppm for drinking water) [56], so the support will not contaminate the environment. Furthermore, Cr(III) compounds are neither irritating, mutagenic, nor carcinogenic [56]. All these properties make MIL-101(Cr)-NH 2 -based materials attractive for catalysis.…”

Palladium Nanoparticles Encapsulated in a Metal–Organic Framework as Efficient Heterogeneous Catalysts for Direct C2 Arylation of Indoles

“…The result may be attributed to the fact that the escape of the nanoparticles from the mesoporous cages (2.9 and 3.4 nm) is difficult through the microporous windows (1.2 and 1.4 nm). There was also no detectable leaching of chromium to the reaction mixtures because of the high stability of MIL‐101(Cr) ( c (Cr)<0.1 ppm for drinking water),18a so the support will not contaminate the environment. If the catalyst was removed after 20 % of conversion (after 6 h) and the resulting filtrate was monitored under identical reaction condition for another 24 h; no further conversion was detected (Table 2, entry 20).…”