2005
DOI: 10.1177/0893318905276561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ironies in the Discursive Struggle of Pilots Defending the Profession

Abstract: This article examines discursive forms of resistance used by a splinter group of a U.S. airline pilots’ union in its campaign against a contract settlement supported by union leaders. Forms of resistance included oppositional tensions, military metaphors, and dualities that surfaced in central themes of the campaign. These discursive strategies revealed ironies of advocating unity while promoting division and arguing to eliminate a two-tiered pay scale while supporting class distinctions between pilots. These … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Dent (2003) has studied the professional-managerial relationships in a hospital under threat, exploring the ironic stance adopted by medical staff in the face of managerialization (and also hospital closure). Real and Putnam (2005) reported how a splinter group of pilots opposed to a management settlement used ironic strategies to defend their professional status, in combination with routine practices of resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Dent (2003) has studied the professional-managerial relationships in a hospital under threat, exploring the ironic stance adopted by medical staff in the face of managerialization (and also hospital closure). Real and Putnam (2005) reported how a splinter group of pilots opposed to a management settlement used ironic strategies to defend their professional status, in combination with routine practices of resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this study reveals, union leaders often make sense of bargaining and contracts by relying on symbols of warfare, for example, fighting, confrontation, and combat. However, past studies show that overreliance on military metaphors often produces practices consistent with these symbols (Real & Putnam, 2005). Thus, using combat language to depict negotiations can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies that foster talking past each other and reaching an impasse.…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the practice of consultants, as it emerged, was to simply submit their PowerPoint slides to the databases, which they considered neither very useful nor relevant to their work (see interview statements above). This can be interpreted as a silent form of resistance to or even subversion of organizational demands (see also the studies by Lynch, 2009, andReal &Putnam, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%