2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irradiation evolution of Cu precipitates in Fe1.0Cu alloy studied by positron annihilation spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Region I and II correspond to a positron energy range of 0.5-8 keV and 8-25 keV, respectively. Based on the experimental and theoretical results from Jin and coworkers where self-ions with a similar energy were implanted [11], Cu precipitates and Cu n V m complexes (n > m) are expected to be the dominant microstructure features in the region I whereas open volume defects, in the forms of dislocations and dislocation loops and Cu n V m complexes (n < m) are the main defect types in the region II.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Region I and II correspond to a positron energy range of 0.5-8 keV and 8-25 keV, respectively. Based on the experimental and theoretical results from Jin and coworkers where self-ions with a similar energy were implanted [11], Cu precipitates and Cu n V m complexes (n > m) are expected to be the dominant microstructure features in the region I whereas open volume defects, in the forms of dislocations and dislocation loops and Cu n V m complexes (n < m) are the main defect types in the region II.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between the irradiation-induced defects and Cu precipitates has been studied both theoretically [7][8][9] and experimentally [10][11][12]. Microstructural studies have shown that the irradiation-induced or enhanced Cu-rich precipitates (CRPs) are responsible for the irradiation hardening in copper-bearing iron-based alloys as they impede the dislocation motion [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HRTEM images of CoCrFeMnNi HEA at different depths after HIPIB irradiation: (a1 -a4 ) 0.3 J/cm 2 , 300 pulses and (b1 -b4 ) 2.0 J/cm 2 , 3 pulses; subscripts 1-4 correspond to the region of near surface, 300 nm depth, 1 μm depth and 2 μm depth, respectively; the electron beam is along [110] zone axis. a change of the elemental distribution around vacancy-type defects [58]. After 1.2 J/cm 2 and 2.0 J/cm 2 irradiation, the elements of CoCrFeMnNi HEA redistributed due to the rapid remelting and solidification, and the change of elements around the vacancies may lead to the generation of the defect of slope III type.…”
Section: The Effects Of Hipib Irradiation On Microstructure Surface Morphology and Mechanical Property Of Cocrfemnni Heamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the samples are exposed to high temperature for a long time, the Au-V complexes aggregate around the irradiated dislocations, which act as nucleation sites to form the Au-rich precipitates [23,44]. Therefore, Au precipitates and dislocations loops dominate the microstructure along the L 5 line [45]. For the Fe-Au-W alloy, simultaneously the mixtureof dislocations between the Au precipitates [23,45] and the Fe matrix act as nucleation sites of the W-rich Laves precipitates, which influence the precipitation behavior of Au-rich precipitates.…”
Section: Doppler Broadening Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%