2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irradiation hardening of pure tungsten exposed to neutron irradiation

Abstract: Pure tungsten samples have been neutron irradiated in HFIR at 90~850°C to 0.03~2.2 dpa. A dispersed barrier hardening model informed by the available microstructure data has been used to predict the hardness. Comparison of the model predictions and the measured Vickers hardness reveals the dominant hardening contribution at various irradiation conditions. For tungsten samples irradiated in HFIR, the results indicate that voids and dislocation loops contributed to the hardness increase in the low dose region (<… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
110
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
9
110
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lifetime of the tungsten monoblocks under heat and neutron irradiation will depend strongly on the evolution of the strength and ductility of the material. A high hardness, which is reported for fission-neutron-irradiated tungsten [2,3] can be associated to a high yield strength and low ductility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lifetime of the tungsten monoblocks under heat and neutron irradiation will depend strongly on the evolution of the strength and ductility of the material. A high hardness, which is reported for fission-neutron-irradiated tungsten [2,3] can be associated to a high yield strength and low ductility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The displacement defects in the lattice induce hardening of the material, as they form obstacles for dislocation motion. A hardness indicator I H , based on the Dispersed Barrier Hardening model, is used to qualitatively study the evolution of the hardness under irradiation [2,12]:…”
Section: Hardeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where α is the barrier strength coefficient, M the Taylor factor (2.7), µ the shear modulus of tantalum (69 GPa), b the Burgers vector of the dislocations (2.76Å), N the density and d the average size of the obstacles (Seeger, 1958;Rosenberg & Piehler, 1971). The value of α depends on the defect type and size for a given temperature (Hu et al, 2016). A value of α = 0.2 has been reported for dislocations in tantalum (Yasunaga et al, 2000), whereas it takes a value of α = 0.25 in the case of voids with a diameter of 1-2 nm (Hu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Void Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of α depends on the defect type and size for a given temperature (Hu et al, 2016). A value of α = 0.2 has been reported for dislocations in tantalum (Yasunaga et al, 2000), whereas it takes a value of α = 0.25 in the case of voids with a diameter of 1-2 nm (Hu et al, 2016). The change in hardness ( H ) corresponds to:…”
Section: Void Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the inherent low-temperature brittleness and recrystallization or irradiation induced embrittlement of tungsten severely limit its application in the extreme conditions of simultaneous high temperature and high flux neutron irradiation [4][5][6]. So it is important to decrease the embrittlement of tungsten materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%