A threshold flux is required to form an image in negative photoresists when they are exposed to kilovolt electron beams. This threshold is related to the gel point of the photoresist. Using the known number of crosslinks per molecule at the gel point, the G values for the crosslinking of KPR and KTFR, were calculated from the absorbed energy of 2.5 _+ 0.2 x 1020 ev/cm ~ at the threshold, to be 0.65 and 1.20, respectively. An energy transfer model based on Bethe's penetration range for an electron and on the distribution of energy with depth of penetration found by Charlesby describes the change in threshold flux with changes in accelerating potential. Electron fluxes above the threshold value fully insolubilize the resist. The efficiency of absorbed energy for total insolubilization is a function of the energy of the incident electrons. 5 keV electrons are 3.3 times more efficient than uv light, but 15 keV electrons are only as efficient as photons.During the manufacture of semiconductor devices, parts of the semiconductor substrate have to be protected against etchants. This is accomplished by exposing photosensitive etch-resistant polymers called photoresists to light through a mask. The desired pattern of etch resistant polymeric material is obtained after a development process, which removes the unexposed portions of negative resists and removes the exposed portions of positive resists (1). The use of light in patterning the photoresist through a mask, limits the narrowest line and the edge resolution that can be routinely made in the photoresist to be wider than 2 ~m and 0.3 ~m, respectively.On the other hand, lines only 0.25 ~m wide (2) with edge resolutions of 0.05 ~m (3) have been prepared by using an electron beam to expose photoresist. Thornley and Sun (4) showed that both 14 and 20 keV electron beams could expose negative resists so that the resists were able to protect SiO2 against etchants. They found that a threshold existed in the exposing electron flux, below which no protection was provided. Above the threshold the amount of protection increased with increasing flux until full protection resulted. Kanaya, Yamazaki, and Tanaka (3) also found a threshold when they studied the thickness of a developed negative resist as a function of electron flux, for electrons accelerated between 20 and 100 keV. Matta (5) showed that the flux required for optimum exposure depends on the energy of the electrons. He feels that backscattered electrons play a part in the exposure process, but Kanya et al. (3) indicate that backscattering should be negligibly small for energies below 20 keV.The electron beam exposure of two negative photoresists has been investigated here. The first resist, Kodak Photosensitive Resist (KPR), contains a polyvinyl cinnamate polymer, while the second Kodak Thin Film Resist (KTFR), contains a polymerized isoprene dimer.'This work assumes that the threshold flux found in the exposure of these resists is related to the gel point of the resist. If this is the case, then the threshold flux sho...