2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-018-1786-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irreducibility of automorphic Galois representations of low dimensions

Abstract: Let π be a polarizable, regular algebraic, cuspidal automorphic representation of GL n (A F ), where F is an imaginary CM field and n ≤ 6. We show that there is a Dirichlet density 1 set L of rational primes, such that for all l ∈ L, the l-adic Galois representations associated to π are irreducible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposition 1.5 ([Xia19]). Fixing Π and letting p vary, the set of rational primes p such that V P (Π) is irreducible for all P | p has density 1.…”
Section: Setupmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Proposition 1.5 ([Xia19]). Fixing Π and letting p vary, the set of rational primes p such that V P (Π) is irreducible for all P | p has density 1.…”
Section: Setupmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If we fix and let p vary, then [ 30 , Theorem 2] shows that there is a density 1 set of rational primes p such that is irreducible for all (and hence unique up to isomorphism).…”
Section: Mapping To Galois Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two impetuses of the problem are the Mumford‐Tate conjecture that concerns the λ$\lambda$‐independence of boldGλ$\mathbf {G}_\lambda ^\circ$ for motivic compatible systems and the irreducibility conjecture that predicts the absolute irreducibility of ρλ$\rho _\lambda$ for compatible systems attached to algebraic cuspidal automorphic forms of GLn(double-struckAK)$\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb {A}_K)$. There have been many studies on the irreducibility and big images of compatible system since 1970s, assuming that {ρλ}λ$\lbrace \rho _\lambda \rbrace _\lambda$ is motivic, see [41, 44, 47] for abelian varieties, [13, 18] for n=3$n=3$, and [14, 15] for n=4$n=4$, automorphic, see [17, 42, 43, 53] for (Hilbert) modular forms, [2, 13] for n=3$n=3$, [11, 12, 16, 40, 57] for n=4$n=4$, [4, 25, 58] for n6$n\leqslant 6$, and [1] in general, and more recently, a weakly compatible system (Definition 2.1), see [1, 35, 38, 39], and [18]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%