1970
DOI: 10.1063/1.1665301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irreducible Cartesian Tensors. III. Clebsch-Gordan Reduction

Abstract: The reduction of products of irreducible Cartesian tensors is formulated generally by means of 3-j tensors. These are special cases of the invariant mappings discussed in Part II [J. A. R. Coope and R. F. Snider, J. Math. Phys. 11, 993 (1970)]. The 3-j formalism is first developed for a general group. Then, the 3-j tensors and spinors for the rotation group are discussed in detail, general formulas in terms of elementary invariant tensors being given. The 6-j and higher n-j symbols coincide with the familiar o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…'~~~ will only be non-vanishing when j * = O , and this can only occur when j=j". Similar reasoning shows that j ' = j"', and hence the substitution of equations (2.3)-(2.6) into (1.2), must give the result Equation (2.7) can be Le-expressed in a natural form [12,13] In order to develop (2.12) further, we note that by projecting the two invariant mappings given expression in (2.8) and (2.9) to their dual bases, through use of the metric tensor g,",", i.e. The invariant tensor mapping operator E:' k,,m, represents a mapping from the rank-j space to the natural rank-j, and hence weight-j, subspace.…”
Section: Calculational Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…'~~~ will only be non-vanishing when j * = O , and this can only occur when j=j". Similar reasoning shows that j ' = j"', and hence the substitution of equations (2.3)-(2.6) into (1.2), must give the result Equation (2.7) can be Le-expressed in a natural form [12,13] In order to develop (2.12) further, we note that by projecting the two invariant mappings given expression in (2.8) and (2.9) to their dual bases, through use of the metric tensor g,",", i.e. The invariant tensor mapping operator E:' k,,m, represents a mapping from the rank-j space to the natural rank-j, and hence weight-j, subspace.…”
Section: Calculational Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the integrand in (1.5) must be rotationally invariant, it forms a basis for a totally symmetric irreducible representation of the rotation-inversion group SO(3). We can ascertain the exact form of this basis by expressing each tensor as a sum of its embedded irreducible tensor components [11][12][13]?.…”
Section: Calculational Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the n -j symbols, Q(kl1') is a normalization factor for 3 -j tensors. 29 In the ES approximation, the j dependence of the transition matrix is determined solely by a 3 -j symbol.…”
Section: Energy-dependent Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demonstration, that the metric in (3) which depends on 10 multipolesF αβ L can be reduced to the form in (6) where the metric depends only on 2 multipoles (M L ,Ŝ L ), is a rather ambitious assignment of a task and makes extensive use of irreducible Cartesian tensor techniques originally introduced in [16][17][18]. Damour & Iyer (1991) [36] have also demonstrated that to order O (c −4 ) their post-Minkowskian multipoles coincide with the post-Newtonian multipoles of Blanchet & Damour (1989) [21] (Eqs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of so-called Cartesian symmetric and tracefree (STF) multipole moments [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] instead of spherical harmonics simplifies considerably the calculations in gravitational physics [19][20][21][22]: the mathematical relations and expressions in gravitational theory become simpler, the numerical algorithms can be performed more efficiently, and the whole approach of gravitational theory becomes more elegant. By now, the STF multipole expansion, in post-Newtonian approximation ("weak-field slow-motion approximation", i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%