2019
DOI: 10.1142/s021821651950007x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irreducible SL(2, ℂ)-metabelian representations of branched twist spins

Abstract: An [Formula: see text]-branched twist spin is a fibered [Formula: see text]-knot in [Formula: see text] which is determined by a [Formula: see text]-knot [Formula: see text] and coprime integers [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. For a [Formula: see text]-knot, Nagasato proved that the number of conjugacy classes of irreducible [Formula: see text]-metabelian representations of the knot group of a [Formula: see text]-knot is determined by the knot determinant of the [Formula: see text]-knot. In this p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same statement with Theorem 1.1 holds true for irreducible metabelian SL(2, C)-representations of the knot group of a classical knot, due to Nagasato [14]. And Fukuda [6] studied irreducible metabelian SL(2, C)-representations of the knot group of a certain surface-knot called a branched twist spin, which is determined from a classical knot and a pair of integers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same statement with Theorem 1.1 holds true for irreducible metabelian SL(2, C)-representations of the knot group of a classical knot, due to Nagasato [14]. And Fukuda [6] studied irreducible metabelian SL(2, C)-representations of the knot group of a certain surface-knot called a branched twist spin, which is determined from a classical knot and a pair of integers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We remark that in this paper, we focus on SU (2)-representations, but, essentially by the same argument, our results hold true also for irreducible metabelian SL(2, C)-representations. See the argument in [6,14,15]. The paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%