Irregular armed forces, shifting patterns of commitment, and fragmented sovereignty in the developing world

Abstract

Historically, the study of state formation has involved a focus on the urban and national conditions under which states monopolize the means of coercion, generate legitimacy, and marshal sufficient economic resources to wage war against enemies while sustaining citizen allegiance through the extension of social programs, new forms of national solidarity, and citizenship. In Charles Tilly's large body of work, these themes loomed large, and they have re-emerged in slightly reformulated ways in an unfinished manuscript that reflected on the relationship between capital and coercion in which he also integrated the element of commitment-or networks of trust-into the study of state formation. This article develops these same ideas but in new directions, casting them in light of contemporary rather than historical developments. Taking as its point of departure the accelerating rates of criminal violence and citizen insecurity in cities of the developing world, this essay suggests that random and targeted violence increasingly perpetrated by "irregular" armed forces pose a direct challenge to state legitimacy and national sovereignty. Through examination of urban and transnational non-state armed actors who use violence to accumulate capital and secure economic dominion, and whose activities reveal alternative networks of commitment, power, authority, and even self-governance, this essay identifies contemporary parallels with the pre-modern period studied by Charles Tilly, arguing that current patterns challenge prevailing national-state forms of sovereignty. Drawing evidence primarily from Mexico and other middle income developing countries that face growing insecurity and armed violence, the article examines the new "spatialities" of irregular armed force, how they form the basis for alternative networks of coercion, allegiance, and reciprocity Theor Soc (

State, Society, and Informality in Cities of the Global South

“…For example, in many slums in the developing world, policing is carried out by vigilante groups, private militias, and gangs operating alongside and/or in competition with one another and government security forces (Davis, 2010;LeBas, 2013;Hidalgo & Lessing, 2015;Moncada, 2016). Private entrepreneurs and cooperatives commonly provide households with water and electricity, often siphoned off from state networks (see Post, Bronsoler, & Salman, 2017).…”

Citizens, Criminalization and Violence in Natural Resource Conflicts in Latin America

“…Environmental citizenship and governance have also been conceptualized as hybrid spaces, in which governance is considered a process of institutional bricolage where different (non-state and state) actors shape institutions that combine modern and traditional components and formal and informal practices in a multi-scalar dynamic (Cleaver, 2002). Other authors have used 'fragmented sovereignty' (Davis, 2010) and 'contested sovereignties' (Sieder, 2011) to capture the phenomenon, focussing more on the fragmented monopoly on violence. Based on the above considerations, I propose to view natural resource conflicts as 'hybrid spaces' in which different actors contest the same territory.…”

State-sponsored Vigilantism: Jewish Settlers’ Violence in the Occupied Palestinian Territories

“…Consequently, violence by non-state actors is often interpreted as a disruptive political force that challenges state power and threatens its exclusive sovereignty (Davis, 2010). Thus, it is considered as an indication of the weakening of the state (Pratten and Sen, 2008) and a threat to the state's monopoly on the legitimate use of violence (Weber, 1978).…”