1982
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(82)90629-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irregular field dose determination with the weighted beam-zone method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The graph of the EPID reveals a steeper slope. This implies different scattering characteristics of the EPID, which has to be adjusted with a correction factor for each pixel, e.g., based on the beam-zone method [19] and the difference between the output factors of the EPID and the reference system.…”
Section: Dependency On Field Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graph of the EPID reveals a steeper slope. This implies different scattering characteristics of the EPID, which has to be adjusted with a correction factor for each pixel, e.g., based on the beam-zone method [19] and the difference between the output factors of the EPID and the reference system.…”
Section: Dependency On Field Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily, this calculation was developed for calibration of dose monitoring in case of irregular irradiation fields. Each field was divided into sectors with a fixed dose value contributing to the central point of the field [15]. Considering the translation method in TBI, the number of sectors represents the patient's body surface definitively treated, and the total dose to the central point in the irradiation field, respectively [14].…”
Section: Treatment Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, there are no computer-based planning systems available to calculate a three-dimensional treatment plan and a dose distribution for this translation technique. Based on the beam-zone method published by Quast and Quast & Glaeser [14,15], dose distribution has to be conventionally calculated in a few points of interest. However, the dose distribution is expected to be inhomogeneous due to variations in the patient's diameter and the local effective field size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%