1989
DOI: 10.5802/aif.1175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irregularities of continuous distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for all x, almost all α and all S ∈ B. Moreover, by a careful consideration of the constants involved in the proof of Theorem 1.3, one can verify that the O-constant will depend only on α, and not on the choice of rectangle S. As a consequence, we obtain the following result, previously shown by Drmota [4] (see also [5]). As clarified by the example in Figure 1, an analogous result does not hold if B is the class of all rectangles.…”
Section: (B)supporting
confidence: 67%
“…for all x, almost all α and all S ∈ B. Moreover, by a careful consideration of the constants involved in the proof of Theorem 1.3, one can verify that the O-constant will depend only on α, and not on the choice of rectangle S. As a consequence, we obtain the following result, previously shown by Drmota [4] (see also [5]). As clarified by the example in Figure 1, an analogous result does not hold if B is the class of all rectangles.…”
Section: (B)supporting
confidence: 67%
“…For the sake of simplicity, let us only consider directions of the form α = (α 1 , 1). Drmota [3] showed that if there exists a constant η < 2 such that the inequality nα 1 < |n| −η has finitely many integer solutions n ∈ Z, then for any axis parallel box R ⊆ [0, 1] 2 we have ∆ T (0, α, R) = O(1). In fact, the implied constant depends only on α, which means that by letting R denote the family of axis parallel boxes in [0, 1] 2 , the discrepancy sup R∈R |∆ T (0, α, R)| is also O(1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%