2010
DOI: 10.1007/s13353-010-0013-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrelevance of CHEK2 variants to diagnosis of breast/ovarian cancer predisposition in Polish cohort

Abstract: CHEK2 gen encodes cell cycle checkpoint kinase 2 that participates in the DNA repair pathway, cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. Mutations in CHEK2 gene may result in kinase inactivation or reduce both catalytic activity and capability of binding other proteins. Some studies indicate that alterations in CHEK2 gene confers increase the risk of breast cancer and some other malignancies, while the results of other studies are inconclusive. Thus the significance of CHEK2 mutations in aetiology of breast cancer i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…CHEK2 mutations are known to increase the risk of prostate and breast cancer [29,[36][37][38]. With regards to ovarian cancer, the results are inconsistent [21,25,27,37,39]. In our study there was no significant association of tested CHEK2 mutations, including 2 protein truncation and 1 missense mutation, with ovarian cancer risk.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…CHEK2 mutations are known to increase the risk of prostate and breast cancer [29,[36][37][38]. With regards to ovarian cancer, the results are inconsistent [21,25,27,37,39]. In our study there was no significant association of tested CHEK2 mutations, including 2 protein truncation and 1 missense mutation, with ovarian cancer risk.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Among BC women from throughout Poland and the South-Western Poland, these mutations were detected with higher frequency than in our investigations: 8.6% (385/4.454) and 9.9% (28/284), respectively [7,8]. …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…On the contrary, Myszka et al (2011) did not show any relationship between the four investigated CHEK2 mutations and the risk of BC among BC women from the South-Western Poland [8]. Such correlation was not found either by Kwiatkowska et al (2006), who investigated only the 1100delC mutation in women with BC originating from East-Central, West-Central and South-Eastern Poland [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important hopes connected with the development of biobanks are: a better recognition of genetic and environmental factors of the hereditary diseases, examining people’s susceptibility to specific diseases (Frazier et al 2008; Wang et al 2010; Brozek et al 2011; Myszka et al 2011); more effective personalized preventive care (e.g. the modern spectrometry allows detection of more than 30 metabolic disorders using the neonatal screening blood spot) (Sharrard and Pollitt 2007), adaptation of the treatment to the patient’s individual genetic characteristics by development of pharmacogenetics (personalized medicine) (Roses 2000; Matimba et al 2008; Szczepanek et al 2011) inventing innovative drug therapies and discovering new biomarkers of many diseases with the use of modern sequencing technologies (Pareek et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%