2017
DOI: 10.1139/cjps-2017-0150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrigated soft white spring wheat is largely unresponsive to conservation management in rotations with dry bean, potato and sugar beet

Abstract: Historically, soft white spring (SWS) wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has been a crop choice in southern Alberta's irrigation districts. A 12-yr (2000-2011) study compared conservation (CONS) and conventional (CONV) management for SWS wheat in 3-5-yr rotations with dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Conservation management incorporated reduced tillage, compost, cover crops, and narrow-row dry bean. Wheat was largely unresponsive to CONS management, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CONV rotations (3‐, 4‐CONV) had more intensive tillage (e.g., moldboard plowing prior to potato), no cover crops or compost, and dry bean in wide rows (60 cm), with inter‐row cultivation and undercutting at harvest. Details of CONV and CONS practices were reported for dry bean (Larney et al., 2015), potato (Larney, Pearson, et al., 2016), wheat (Larney et al., 2018), and sugar beet (Larney, Nitschelm, et al., 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CONV rotations (3‐, 4‐CONV) had more intensive tillage (e.g., moldboard plowing prior to potato), no cover crops or compost, and dry bean in wide rows (60 cm), with inter‐row cultivation and undercutting at harvest. Details of CONV and CONS practices were reported for dry bean (Larney et al., 2015), potato (Larney, Pearson, et al., 2016), wheat (Larney et al., 2018), and sugar beet (Larney, Nitschelm, et al., 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative study on different rotation periods in wheat cultivation revealed an increased soil health during the wheat phase of the 5-year rotation compared to the 3-year one, due to a higher microbial biomass [76]. Another study within the same research project showed that the wheat yield amounts were 23-82% higher under various rotation periods, compared to the continuous cultivation of wheat [77]. Overall, the current trend of wheat cultivation in Fars province is not only harming the environment, but could also lead to a reduced seeding efficiency and overall productivity, while increasing production costs due to the need for intensive fertilization.…”
Section: Loss Due To Excessive Seed Usementioning
confidence: 98%