Irrigation effects on the performance of grapevine (&lt;em&gt;Vitis vinifera&lt;/em&gt; L.) cv. ‘Albariño’ under the humid climate of Galicia

Mirás-Avalos, José Manuel; Trigo-Córdoba, Emiliano; Bouzas-Cid, Yolanda; Orriols-Fernández, Ignacio

doi:10.20870/oeno-one.2016.50.4.63

Cited by 12 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Both vineyard plots are projected to face increased dryness, driven by changes in precipitation patterns and rising temperatures. This heightened aridity, according to the index classification, may exacerbate water scarcity concerns, requiring irrigation and sustainable water management strategies to maintain typicity, yields and quality [86]. Hence, the future climatic conditions for plots QB and HE require proactive adaptation measures that will be essential for vineyard management in these plots to improve sustainability and produce high-quality wines amidst adverse climatic conditions.…”

Section: Bioclimatic Indicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vineyard Microclimatic Zoning as a Tool to Promote Sustainable Viticulture under Climate Change

Fonseca,

Cruz,

Fraga

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding microclimate spatial variability is crucial for sustainable and optimised grape production within vineyard plots. By employing a combination of a microclimate model (NicheMapR) and multiple climate data sources, this study aimed to achieve microclimatic analysis in two vineyard plots, Quinta do Bomfim (northern Portugal) and Herdade do Esporão (southern Portugal). This approach provides an innovative 10 m spatial resolution for climate variables. This study incorporated local station hourly data with quantile mapping bias correction on the ERA5-land data. The microclimate model output was employed to perform bias correction on a EURO-CORDEX model ensemble. Climate extreme and bioclimatic indices specifically targeted to viticulture were calculated for each vineyard plot. The 10 m scale was analysed to identify potential shifts in temperature extremes, precipitation patterns, and other crucial climatic variables for grape cultivation within each specific plot. The significance of microclimate analyses was higher in areas with intricate topography, while in areas with smooth slopes, the variation of climatic variables was determined to be negligible. There was a projected increase in the median temperature of approximately 3.5 °C and 3.6 °C and a decrease in precipitation of approximately 98 mm and 105 mm in Quinta do Bomfim and Herdade do Esporão, respectively, when comparing a future scenario for the period 2071–2100 against the historical period (1981–2010). Hence, this study offers a comprehensive and future-oriented method for analysing microclimates in vineyard plots. By incorporating geospatial data, ERA5-land data, and the microclimate NicheMapR model, this research aimed to enhance the understanding of current microclimates and future climate scenarios for viticulturists.

show abstract

Section: Bioclimatic Indicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vineyard Microclimatic Zoning as a Tool to Promote Sustainable Viticulture under Climate Change

Fonseca,

Cruz,

Fraga

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Increased temperatures and changing rainfall patterns due to climate change increase demands on water resources and provide incentive to revise water management strategies and their relation to vineyard productivity (Cancela et al 2016, Bonada et al 2020. Revised irrigation practices must consider altered rainfall patterns that advance the onset of water stress during the growing season (Sebastian et al 2015, Mirás-Avalos et al 2016) and should prioritize using irrigation to manage heat waves (Garcia-Tejera et al 2023). New techniques focus on efficient water use (De La Hera et al 2007, Acevedo-Opazo et al 2010, Pérez-Álvarez et al 2021 to ensure economic yields (Tangolar et al 2015).…”

Section: Effects Of Vineyard Management Practices On Winegrape Yield ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The effect of water stress can depend on its timing during the growth cycle (Chorti et al 2016). For example, water stress between budbreak and flowering can reduce shoot growth and fruit set (Mirás-Avalos et al 2016). Whether due to reduced fruit set (Hardie and Considine 1976) or reduced berry weight and cluster number per vine (Alexander 1965, Levin et al 2020, yield is particularly reduced when the water deficit occurs in the first few weeks after flowering (McCarthy 1997).…”

Section: Irrigation (Reduced)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Vineyard Management Practices on Winegrape Yield Components. A Review Using Meta-analysis

Cameron,

Petrie,

Bonada

2024

Am J Enol Vitic.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and goalsVineyard management practices can improve production outcomes, including fruit quality and disease prevention. The results of these practices are variable due to vineyard factors such as production capacity, growing environment, and the intensity at which the practice is applied. The meta-analysis reported herein synthesizes data on the effects of vineyard management practices, to better inform vineyard managers of their likely outcomes. Methods and key findingsA meta-analysis was used to investigate vineyard practices including cluster thinning, irrigation, leaf removal, pruning severity, pruning timing, shoot thinning, and shoot trimming, and their effects on yield and on yield components such as berry number per cluster, berry weight, cluster weight, and cluster number. Cluster thinning, leaf removal, shoot thinning, and irrigation reduction significantly reduced yield. Reduced pruning severity increased yield as the bud number increased. All yield components were significantly reduced by reduced irrigation. Cluster thinning and shoot thinning could partially compensate for reduced cluster number with corresponding increases in berry number per cluster, berry weight, and cluster weight. When pruning was less severe, the decreased berry number per cluster, berry weight, and cluster weight partially counteracted the increase in cluster number. In many cases, the timing and severity of vineyard management practices led to different outcomes; this interaction must be considered when making management decisions. Conclusions and significanceThis meta-analysis provides important information to better predict yield outcomes after implementation of various vineyard management practices.

show abstract

“…However, the difference may be strongly influenced by the seasonal accumulated transpiration, which in the study reported by Phogat et al (2017) was approximately twice as high as that estimated in this study. Most of the published studies refer to WP as the yield per unit of water used in evapotranspiration (Kijne et al 2003;Fereres and Soriano 2007) or applied through irrigation + rainfall (Egea et al 2010;Ghrab et al 2013;Mirás-Avalos et al 2016). In the present study, WP calculated based on this definition was named as agronomic water productivity (AWP) and it ranged from 2.18 kg m −3 (SYR in 2017) to 5.34 kg m −3 (TMP in 2016) (Fig.…”

Section: Maps Of Transpiration Ratio Irrigation Efficiency Water Productivity and Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimizing precision irrigation of a vineyard to improve water use efficiency and profitability by using a decision-oriented vine water consumption model

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While the agronomic and economic benefits of regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) strategies have long been established in red wine grape varieties, spatial variability in water requirements across a vineyard limits their practical application. This study aims to evaluate the performance of an integrated methodology—based on a vine water consumption model and remote sensing data—to optimize the precision irrigation (PI) of a 100-ha commercial vineyard during two consecutive growing seasons. In addition, a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) was conducted of the tested strategy. Using an NDVI generated map, a vineyard with 52 irrigation sectors and the varieties Tempranillo, Cabernet and Syrah was classified in three categories (Low, Medium and High). The proposed methodology allowed viticulturists to adopt a precise RDI strategy, and, despite differences in water requirement between irrigation sectors, pre-defined stem water potential thresholds were not exceeded. In both years, the difference between maximum and minimum water applied in the different irrigation sectors varied by as much as 25.6%. Annual transpiration simulations showed ranges of 240.1–340.8 mm for 2016 and 298.6–366.9 mm for 2017. According to the CBA, total savings of 7090.00 € (2016) and 9960.00 € (2017) were obtained in the 100-ha vineyard with the PI strategy compared to not PI. After factoring in PI technology and labor costs of 5090 €, the net benefit was 20.0 € ha−1 in 2016 and 48.7 € ha−1 in 2017. The water consumption model adopted here to optimize PI is shown to enhance vineyard profitability, water use efficiency and yield.

show abstract

Irrigation effects on the performance of grapevine (<em>Vitis vinifera</em> L.) cv. ‘Albariño’ under the humid climate of Galicia

Cited by 12 publications

References 31 publications

Vineyard Microclimatic Zoning as a Tool to Promote Sustainable Viticulture under Climate Change

Vineyard Microclimatic Zoning as a Tool to Promote Sustainable Viticulture under Climate Change

Effects of Vineyard Management Practices on Winegrape Yield Components. A Review Using Meta-analysis

Optimizing precision irrigation of a vineyard to improve water use efficiency and profitability by using a decision-oriented vine water consumption model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About