2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9121276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrigation Performance Assessment in Table Grape Using the Reflectance-Based Crop Coefficient

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper, we present the results of our study on the operational application of the reflectance-based crop coefficient for assessing table grape irrigation requirements. The methodology was applied to provide irrigation advice and to assess the irrigation performance. The net irrigation water requirements (NIWR) simulated using the reflectance-based basal crop coefficient were provided to the farmer during the growing season and compared with the actual irrigation volumes applied. Two treatments … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, Figure 10c,d show that estimating the Kc provided by the eddy covariance system (Kc EC), which is the ratio between ET EC and ET 0 , has standard deviation of 0.04 and does not reach the Kc Target of 0.5, thus implying that the irrigation applied is lower than the estimated by the vineyard irrigation management. Hence, the Kc estimated by the RS-PMS model (Kc PMS), this means the ratio between ET RS-PMS and ET 0 , is reasonably similar to the Kc EC with a bias around 9% and standard deviation of 0.06, which would allow accurately the evaluation and monitoring of irrigation [101][102][103][104] at a spatial scale of 10 m × 10 m and a daily and weekly temporal scale, which are suitable for irrigation management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Nonetheless, Figure 10c,d show that estimating the Kc provided by the eddy covariance system (Kc EC), which is the ratio between ET EC and ET 0 , has standard deviation of 0.04 and does not reach the Kc Target of 0.5, thus implying that the irrigation applied is lower than the estimated by the vineyard irrigation management. Hence, the Kc estimated by the RS-PMS model (Kc PMS), this means the ratio between ET RS-PMS and ET 0 , is reasonably similar to the Kc EC with a bias around 9% and standard deviation of 0.06, which would allow accurately the evaluation and monitoring of irrigation [101][102][103][104] at a spatial scale of 10 m × 10 m and a daily and weekly temporal scale, which are suitable for irrigation management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The vines were own-rooted, planted during 1996 winter for Pisco elaboration at a planting distance of 2.0 m × 3.5 m, and trained on an overhead trellis system at a height of 2 m above the ground. The climate of the site is classified as hyper-arid since it rains lower than 100 mm per year [34][35][36]. Due to the low rainfall that was recorded during the season and the high vapor pressure deficit, it is necessary to apply water through irrigation.…”
Section: Experimental Site and Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil is classified as alluvial clay and belongs to the Entisol order [22]. The climatic characteristics of the study site were described in the reports published by Verdugo-Vásquez et al [23,24].…”
Section: Soil and Climate Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%