2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrigation response and water productivity of deficit to fully irrigated spring camelina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
13
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the lower seed yields observed in 2012 and 2013 could also have been due to the above-mentioned factors, particularly lower seasonal precipitation and lower seasonal GDD (particularly in May) in both growing seasons (Table 1). These suggestions were consistent with multiple reports that showed that water deficit interferes with reproduction in crop plants, thereby reducing grain yields [35,[55][56][57]. Due to the sandy clay nature of soil, factors such as change in stored soil water content, run off, and deep percolation were minimal (approximately zero) in our field plot sites.…”
Section: Effect Of Irrigation On Seed Yieldsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the lower seed yields observed in 2012 and 2013 could also have been due to the above-mentioned factors, particularly lower seasonal precipitation and lower seasonal GDD (particularly in May) in both growing seasons (Table 1). These suggestions were consistent with multiple reports that showed that water deficit interferes with reproduction in crop plants, thereby reducing grain yields [35,[55][56][57]. Due to the sandy clay nature of soil, factors such as change in stored soil water content, run off, and deep percolation were minimal (approximately zero) in our field plot sites.…”
Section: Effect Of Irrigation On Seed Yieldsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, a higher seed yield production was obtained by Celine, Columbia, and Yellowstone in the drier years of 2012 and 2013, by Calena in 2012, and Suneson in 2013, compared to their average seed yield in the respective years. The seed yields for C. sativa across the different growing conditions ranged from 425-2867 kg ha −1 [35,56], which agreed with the seed yield range observed in this study. The results from this study suggested that Calena, Celine, Columbia, and Yellowstone might be better suited for dryland production than the other tested cultivars, but additional trials under semi-arid and arid conditions are needed to validate this claim.…”
Section: Effect Of Irrigation On Seed Yieldsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Distribution of irrigation was based on the weather station data and HI was not evapo-transpiration-limited. Actual evapo-transpiration obtained through weather stations operated by the High Plains Climate Center (Changnon et al, 1990) was used to calculate water use (Hergert et al, 2011). The water holding capacity of the soil was 6 cm in the top 30 cm.…”
Section: Irrigation Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these studies wateruse functions were developed (Johnston et al, 2002;Brandt and McGregor, 1997;Nielsen, 1998). Recently, water-use functions of irrigated canola have been calculated for western Nebraska (Hergert et al, 2011(Hergert et al, , 2015. Irrigation studies in North America focused on the stage of canola growth that is most sensitive to water stress (Nuttall et al, 1992;Stoker and Carter, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controlled deficit irrigation ranges from 0 to 600 mm for maize in northern Togo. The DS-CDI strategy seems to save water with an insignificant reduction in the grain yield relative to full irrigation [87][88][89][90][91][92]. Overall, growing maize crop in the dry season in Figure 6b shows the stochastic crop-water production functions (SCWPF) for optimized irrigated maize crop in the dry season in northern Togo.…”
Section: Ws -Cdi Ws -Cdi Ws -Fi Ds -Fi Ds -Cdimentioning
confidence: 99%