Irrigation using hybrid constructed wetland treated domestic sewage: Uptake of phthalic acid esters and antibiotics by Ipomoea aquatica forssk

Tang, Xiaoyan; Liu, Huanping; Naïla, Razanatsoa Siou Line; Dai, Yunv; Zhang, Xiaomeng; Tam, Nora Fung-Yee; Xiong, Chunhui; Yang, Yang

doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124025

Cited by 12 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The researchers used the CW hybrid system to treat domestic wastewater and achieved a 93% removal of ciprofloxacin [ 177 ]. Another study showed that the antimicrobial removal rate of domestic sewage treated with mixed artificial humidity was 28.5–99.4%, and the combination of Ipomoea aquatica forssk was more effective for antimicrobial removal [ 178 ]. Full scale CW showed antimicrobial removal from 13% to 100%, and Log removal of ARGs in the water phase was low (0.8 to 1.5 log) [ 179 ].…”

Section: Methods To Mitigate Antimicrobial Contamination and Antimicr...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Antimicrobial and the Resistances in the Environment: Ecological and Health Risks, Influencing Factors, and Mitigation Strategies

Wang

Weng

Luo

et al. 2023

Toxics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Antimicrobial contamination and antimicrobial resistance have become global environmental and health problems. A large number of antimicrobials are used in medical and animal husbandry, leading to the continuous release of residual antimicrobials into the environment. It not only causes ecological harm, but also promotes the occurrence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. The role of environmental factors in antimicrobial contamination and the spread of antimicrobial resistance is often overlooked. There are a large number of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and antimicrobial resistance genes in human beings, which increases the likelihood that pathogenic bacteria acquire resistance, and also adds opportunities for human contact with antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. In this paper, we review the fate of antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance in the environment, including the occurrence, spread, and impact on ecological and human health. More importantly, this review emphasizes a number of environmental factors that can exacerbate antimicrobial contamination and the spread of antimicrobial resistance. In the future, the timely removal of antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance genes in the environment will be more effective in alleviating antimicrobial contamination and antimicrobial resistance.

show abstract

Section: Methods To Mitigate Antimicrobial Contamination and Antimicr...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Antimicrobial and the Resistances in the Environment: Ecological and Health Risks, Influencing Factors, and Mitigation Strategies

Wang

Weng

Luo

et al. 2023

Toxics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For the primary studies, the most common water type was from agricultural runoff (n = 148), with both agriculture and urban runoff encompassing 18 studies, and urban runoff alone assessed in 15 studies (Figure 6). Studies investigating urban and agricultural runoff were either not specific about the water type and instead reported contaminant(s) applied in upstream regions (e.g., sulfonamides used to treat both human and animal infections [76,90,170], or the field site for the primary studies' watershed contained both urban and agricultural runoff [74,80]. Finally, nature reserve was the least studied landscape (n = 1); Tsui et al (2008) Seven different types of contaminants were studied: nutrients, pesticides, antibiotics, other pharmaceuticals besides antibiotics, metals, minerals, and industrial by-products (Table S1).…”

Section: Source and Mixture Of Contaminant Types Entering Wetlandsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sorption to wetland media was a removal mechanism of focus for 18% of the primary studies (Table 5). This included studies that compared different media types [67,104,170] or analyzed the amount of contaminant sorbed to the wetland media by determining the concentrations of contaminants [74,87,135,170,229] or determining sorption isotherm coefficients for the media [137,196,198]. The different media types found in the primary studies included biochar [59,170,179,192], straw [133,134], compost [170], different types of soil [67,145,196,197], gravel [104, 161,229], pebbles [179], zeolite [59,114,147,218], and cobbles [104].…”

Section: Removal Mechanisms and Efficienciesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Literature Review of Wetland Treatment Systems Used to Treat Runoff Mixtures Containing Antibiotics and Pesticides from Urban and Agricultural Landscapes

Nottingham

Messer

2021

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wetland treatment systems are used extensively across the world to mitigate surface runoff. While wetland treatment for nitrogen mitigation has been comprehensively reviewed, the implications of common-use pesticides and antibiotics on nitrogen reduction remain relatively unreviewed. Therefore, this review seeks to comprehensively assess the removal of commonly used pesticides and antibiotics and their implications for nitrogen removal in wetland treatment systems receiving non-point source runoff from urban and agricultural landscapes. A total of 181 primary studies were identified spanning 37 countries. Most of the reviewed publications studied pesticides (n = 153) entering wetlands systems, while antibiotics (n = 29) had fewer publications. Even fewer publications reviewed the impact of influent mixtures on nitrogen removal processes in wetlands (n = 16). Removal efficiencies for antibiotics (35–100%), pesticides (−619–100%), and nitrate-nitrogen (−113–100%) varied widely across the studies, with pesticides and antibiotics impacting microbial communities, the presence and type of vegetation, timing, and hydrology in wetland ecosystems. However, implications for the nitrogen cycle were dependent on the specific emerging contaminant present. A significant knowledge gap remains in how wetland treatment systems are used to treat non-point source mixtures that contain nutrients, pesticides, and antibiotics, resulting in an unknown regarding nitrogen removal efficiency as runoff contaminant mixtures evolve.

show abstract

“…Constructed wetlands are used to treat sewage and sludge by combining the effects of soil, plants, microorganisms, and arti cial media (Fhl et al 2020;Overbeek et al 2020;Tang et al 2020). They have the advantages of low construction cost and good treatment effect, etc.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Removal of Phosphorus from Domestic Sewage by a Constructed Wetland Coupled Microbial Fuel Cell System

Dou

Yin

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A constructed wetland (CW) coupled microbial fuel cell (MFC) system that treats wastewater and generates electricity was constructed. The total phosphorus in the simulated domestic sewage was used as the treatment target, and the optimal phosphorus removal effect and electricity generation were determined by comparing the changes in substrates, hydraulic retention times, and microorganisms. The mechanism underlying phosphorus removal was also analyzed. The experimental results showed that the best removal efficiencies of the two CW-MFC systems that used magnesia and garnet as substrates were 80.3% and 92.4%, respectively. Phosphorus removal by the garnet matrix mainly depends on a complex adsorption process whereas the magnesia system relies on ion exchange reactions. The CW-MFC system can also generate electricity. The highest output voltage and stable voltage of the garnet system were both higher than those of the magnesia system. The maximum stable voltage of the garnet device was 500 mV, while that of the magnesia device was 290 mV. The microorganisms in the soil and in the electrode within the wetland sediments also substantially changed, indicating that microorganisms positively respond to the removal of organic matter and power generation. Combining the advantages of constructed wetlands and microbial fuel cells also improves phosphorus removal in the coupled system. Therefore, when studying a CW-MFC system, the selection of electrode materials, matrix, and system structure should be taken into account in order to find a method that will improve the power generation capacity of the system and remove phosphorus.

show abstract

Irrigation using hybrid constructed wetland treated domestic sewage: Uptake of phthalic acid esters and antibiotics by Ipomoea aquatica forssk

Cited by 12 publications

References 51 publications

Antimicrobial and the Resistances in the Environment: Ecological and Health Risks, Influencing Factors, and Mitigation Strategies

Antimicrobial and the Resistances in the Environment: Ecological and Health Risks, Influencing Factors, and Mitigation Strategies

A Literature Review of Wetland Treatment Systems Used to Treat Runoff Mixtures Containing Antibiotics and Pesticides from Urban and Agricultural Landscapes

Removal of Phosphorus from Domestic Sewage by a Constructed Wetland Coupled Microbial Fuel Cell System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About