DOI: 10.3990/1.9789036529006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IRT model fit from different perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
(202 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The example pertains to the scale for 'Attitude towards English Reading' which consisted of 50 items with five response categories for each. The data is based on the instrument reported by Khalid [32], who has evaluated the psychometric properties of the scale and found it to be appropriate for similar studies. The scale was administered to 8th grade students in a number of elementary schools in Pakistan.…”
Section: An Empirical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The example pertains to the scale for 'Attitude towards English Reading' which consisted of 50 items with five response categories for each. The data is based on the instrument reported by Khalid [32], who has evaluated the psychometric properties of the scale and found it to be appropriate for similar studies. The scale was administered to 8th grade students in a number of elementary schools in Pakistan.…”
Section: An Empirical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For static student models, this process can be as straightforward as assessing the power of a model to predict successes and failures from a subset of student response outcomes. Validation has also been extensively studied for static learner models such as IRT, for which statistics such as person-fit and item-fit are a standard part of most software packages (see Khalid 2009 for a recent review). However, validation is more complex for dynamically changing learner models such as CT and CBM tutors.…”
Section: Assessing Learner Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%