2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00239-008-9115-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is 16S rDNA a Reliable Phylogenetic Marker to Characterize Relationships Below the Family Level in the Enterobacteriaceae?

Abstract: The phylogenetic relationships of multiple enterobacterial species were reconstructed based on 16S rDNA gene sequences to evaluate the robustness of this housekeeping gene in the taxonomic placement of the enteric plant pathogens Erwinia, Brenneria, Pectobacterium, and Pantoea. Four data sets were compiled, two of which consisted of previously published data. The data sets were designed in order to evaluate how 16S rDNA gene phylogenies are affected by the use of different plant pathogen accessions and varying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
68
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, bootstrap values for each clade were low, indicating that the phylogenetic position of strain QC88-366 T was not certain. This kind of phenomenon has been reported previously, where several genera within Enterobacteriaceae were shown to be polyphyletic based on 16S rRNA gene sequence phylogeny (Naum et al, 2008;Popp et al, 2010). Therefore, it was difficult to classify the isolate systematically on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequences, as it was close to the borderline among multiple genera within Enterobacteriaceae.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, bootstrap values for each clade were low, indicating that the phylogenetic position of strain QC88-366 T was not certain. This kind of phenomenon has been reported previously, where several genera within Enterobacteriaceae were shown to be polyphyletic based on 16S rRNA gene sequence phylogeny (Naum et al, 2008;Popp et al, 2010). Therefore, it was difficult to classify the isolate systematically on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequences, as it was close to the borderline among multiple genera within Enterobacteriaceae.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In that study, strains from DNA HG II, IV and V (referred to as MLSA groups E, F, H and I) and Pectobacterium cypripedii were suggested to be members of the genus Pantoea. Previous studies have also questioned the taxonomic position of Pectobacterium cypripedii, as it does not cluster with other Pectobacterium species and several different 16S rRNA gene sequences are available for the type strain of this species (Spröer et al, 1999;Samson et al, 2005;Young & Park, 2007;Naum et al, 2008;Yarza et al, 2008). In this study, we propose the taxonomic reclassification of strains from Brenner's DNA HG II, IV and V and Pectobacterium cypripedii within the genus Pantoea.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Strains of Erwinia, Brenneria, Pectobacterium, Dickeya and Pantoea were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (Appalachian Fruit Research Center, Kearneysville, WV), and from Dr Amy Charkowski (University of Wisconsin, Madison) as frozen cultures and LuriaBertani (LB) slants respectively. Sample authentication was confirmed based on 16S rDNA sequence analysis prior to their use (Naum et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This economically important group of enterobacterial plant pathogens is distributed worldwide, and they vary widely in their ecology, host range tropism, and pathogenicity (Krieg & Holt, 1985). The strains used in this study have been well characterized taxonomically and their evolutionary history has been described based on numerous housekeeping genes (Brown et al, 2000;Hauben et al, 1998;Naum et al, 2008;Young & Park, 2007). For example, Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation