Is a knowledge society possible without freedom of access to information?

Abstract

Modern information and communication technologies (ICTs) are seen not only as allowing global economicactivities and the sharing of knowledge, but also as favouring transparency and democracy by creating space and a public sphere for civil society. The internet, and in particular the world wide web, have proved a powerful tool in both the manipulation of economic activities and the mobilization of civil society. Much is made of the democratizing effect of ICTs in e-government. Yet there are governments that attempt to control in an authoritarian manner both who accesses the internet and what content may be accessed and used. The question arises whether an information society and, more critically, a knowledge society can develop in the absence of freedom of access to information, freedom of expression and freedom to access the digital economy. Against this broad background the authors put forward four pillars of a knowledge society: (a) ICTs and connectivity, (b) content and the usability thereof, (c) infrastructure other than ICTs, and (d) human capacity. They attempt to evaluate the effect of authoritarian governmental control of access and content on each of them. It is argued from an ethical perspective, and more specifically from a perspective of social justice that, while a technologically oriented concept of the information society may not be incompatible with severe state control, a more multi-dimensional knowledge society cannot develop under such circumstances. Freedom is fundamental to participation in a knowledge society. Purely pragmatic arguments lead to the same conclusion.

South Africa as an information and knowledge society: benefit to the informal sector women entrepreneurs

“…According to Lor and Britz (2007:392), many authors use the concept ""information society" interchangeably with the newer concept of the knowledge society. However, the opinions given by Nassimbeni (1998), Lor and Britz (2007) and other authors such as Martin (1995) and Webster (2002) attest to a general view that the information society has evolved over time. Despite all these arguments, one has to look also at the definition of the concept as presented at the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) in Geneva in 2003 to establish if the concept"s definition has evolved over time.…”

Climate change and its effects on urban spaces in Chile: A summary of research carried out in the period 2000-2012

“…However, these structural measures make no sense to the community if its members are not properly informed. The State must therefore ensure the transfer of knowledge from the political-scientific world by means of education (Lor and Britz, 2007;Monroy-Concha and Pincheira-Ulbrich, 2013). In this way, education can influence policy design, facilitate local governability and improve the organizational control and responsibility of institutions (Duhart, 2006).…”

To talk or not to talk? From Telkom to Hellkom1: A critical reflection on the current telecommunication policy in South Africa from a social justice perspective

“…The denial of access to information is therefore no longer merely a denial of access to the ideas held by others, or oppression of the freedom of expression; it will also marginalize people's participation in various economic, political and sociocultural activities. It touches the very heart of the modern information era (Lor & Britz, 2007).…”