2011
DOI: 10.1097/igc.0b013e318226f657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a Low Dose of Concomitant Chemotherapy With Extended-Field Radiotherapy Acceptable as an Efficient Treatment for Cervical Cancer Patients With Metastases to the Para-Aortic Lymph Nodes?

Abstract: A dose greater than 54 Gy for positive PALs in EFRT, in combination with intracavitary irradiation and low-dose weekly cisplatin administration, was safely completed by all of our patients. However, half of the patients had distant failure. This study provided relatively favorable local control and survival. Further considering modifications of the treatment should therefore be encouraged.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, none of the patients whose PALN dose was ≥50.4 Gy had an in-field PALN recurrence. Kazumoto et al reported that 93.8% of PALN was controlled using a PALN dose 54–60 Gy [24]. This is compatible with the results of the present study, and an adequate dose to PALN is suggested.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, none of the patients whose PALN dose was ≥50.4 Gy had an in-field PALN recurrence. Kazumoto et al reported that 93.8% of PALN was controlled using a PALN dose 54–60 Gy [24]. This is compatible with the results of the present study, and an adequate dose to PALN is suggested.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although only two patients (7.7%) in our study showed pathologic evidence of PALN involvement, the EFRT outcome was comparable to those reported in other studies. The Kazumoto study, with similarly diagnosed criteria and treatment techniques, reported outcomes including tolerability and control rate of low-dose cisplatin with EFRT in patients with PALN metastases diagnosed by CT imaging [24]. A higher PALN dose than in our study can result in a higher 5-year OS (56.3%) with feasible tolerability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For patients initially diagnosed with PAN metastasis, the efficacy of concurrent chemotherapy seems to be uncertain. Since Stryker et al reported that cisplatin-based chemotherapy may be beneficial [ 3 ], many studies have continued to report favorable outcomes, despite more acute severe hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity [ 7 - 9 , 17 , 18 ]. In reviewing our results, we did not observe a significant survival benefit for the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to EFRT, although the group that received EFRT alone included more patients with disease of advanced stage (p < 0.001, Additional file 1 : Table S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some prospective and retrospective trials with EFRT plus concurrent chemotherapy, severe toxicity of EFRT plus concurrent chemotherapy, including gastrointestinal or hematologic toxicity, was observed despite a favorable survival rate [ 6 - 8 ]. Therefore, some investigators have tried to reduce the toxicity of EFRT plus concurrent chemotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy or low dose chemotherapy [ 9 , 10 ]. However, despite a large number of small population studies, the effect of EFRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy has still not been elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%