2013
DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-1477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a Strategy Based on Routine Endotracheal Cultures the Best Way to Prescribe Antibiotics in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trachea may not be the ideal location to study pneumonia, as this disease is defined by the infection of the bronchia and alveoli. Indeed, ETA cultures have a limited predictive value for VAP compared with BAL 35. This might also explain that the sequencing results did not correspond to the culture results, although this was observed previously in other studies that used BAL fluid as well 25 36.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The trachea may not be the ideal location to study pneumonia, as this disease is defined by the infection of the bronchia and alveoli. Indeed, ETA cultures have a limited predictive value for VAP compared with BAL 35. This might also explain that the sequencing results did not correspond to the culture results, although this was observed previously in other studies that used BAL fluid as well 25 36.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Luna and associates prospectively studied an antibiotic strategy based on routine endotracheal aspirate (ETA) culture in 283 ventilated patients, compared to empiric therapy based on the 2005 ATS/IDSA guidelines [54]. Sensitivity for ETA to predict a BAL-obtained pathogen was 62.4 % and was better if done within 3 days of VAP onset.…”
Section: Role Of Surveillance Culture For De-escalationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, an ETA was considered to be unavailable. The 3-day interval was chosen because significant changes in ETA results are unlikely to occur within this time frame, and this interval proved to be superior for antibiotic guidance than was a 7-day interval (20,21). Paired ETA-BALF samples were subsequently compared.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 CFU/ml are used (17,21,31,32). Using various thresholds for positivity in the studied population contributes to heterogeneity and thereby makes study results difficult to compare.…”
Section: Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%