Due to the complexity of health promotion interventions, uneconomical evaluation indicators are recommended. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of multi-component workplace health promotion intervention. The goals were to study the association of health promotion with health status. In a controlled study trial, 278 workers of primary schools and municipal administration had the chance to participate in six-month workplace health promotion program. Employees have fulfilled a questionnaire at baseline and then again after completion of the program. The results showed that in the test group, the incidence of problems with health significantly declined, but the rating of health status decreased and the average absence days increased over time. The higher working hours per week correlated to obesity and high blood pressure. It can be concluded that workplace health promotion activity could support a change in health status and therefore contribute to higher quality of life.
IntroductionProblem statement Health promotion includes many meanings under which are hidden all the activities and programs that support human health (Development, 2004). In Europe, organizations introduced health promotion mainly due to pressures from laws, requirements of workers and their health problems, and in order to raise their reputation. The European model treats the individual and his environment includes a wide range of work methods and tries to integrate into the existing structure of the organization. Europe is therefore somewhat less focused on the risk factors in an individual and more on the quality of working life and working environment (O'Donnel, 2002). As is clear from the research, there are many potential benefits of health promotion in the workplace (Aldana et al., 2005;Baxter et al., 2014;Goetzel & Ozminkowski, 2008;Rongen et al., 2013): improved satisfaction with work, increased loyalty, increased involvement of employees, improved interpersonal relationships at work, enhanced self-esteem, creativity, employee productivity, improved organizations' reputation, smaller turnover, easier recruitment of new personnel, improved health of employees, reduced absenteeism, tardiness, and injuries at work, less use of health services, reduced treatment costs, amongst many others. Health is determined by changes in which a person can consciously make decisions and achieve the best in given circumstances. Understanding health as a complex entity, therefore, sets health promotion as intricate, and health interventions as difficult to synthesize (Waters et al., 2006). Workplace health promotion efficiency evaluation is crucial for managers to support these activities in organizations. Process evaluation provides an analysis of the development during implementation of the program and measures the ratio between the result and the expectations. The program evaluation measures the changes that have occurred in connection with the activities carried out. A cause-effect relationship between health promotion and...