2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Acquired Disgust More Difficult to Extinguish Than Acquired Fear? an Event-Related Potential Study

Abstract: This study used the classical conditioned acquisition and extinction paradigm to compare which of the two emotions, acquired disgust and acquired fear, was more difficult to extinguish, based on behavioral assessments and the event-related potential (ERP) technique. Behavioral assessments revealed that, following successful conditioned extinction, acquired disgust was more difficult to extinguish. The ERP results showed that, at the early stage of P1, the amplitude of conditioned fear was significantly smaller… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study by Carretié et al (2011) , subjectively rated disgust and fear-evoking images were used to assess valence and arousal; normal participants aged 19 to 30 years performed relatively worse for numerical categorization tasks when presented with disgust-evoking images. Zeng and Zheng (2019) also found that aversive stimuli attracted more attention resources, and normal participants aged 17 to 24 years with high aversive sensitivity showed higher attentional bias to all stimuli, suggesting that it was more difficult to disengage from disgust than from fear. In a study by Cisler et al (2009) where the rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm was used, normal participants aged 18 to 21 years were found to have more difficulty in attentional disengagement from aversive words.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In a study by Carretié et al (2011) , subjectively rated disgust and fear-evoking images were used to assess valence and arousal; normal participants aged 19 to 30 years performed relatively worse for numerical categorization tasks when presented with disgust-evoking images. Zeng and Zheng (2019) also found that aversive stimuli attracted more attention resources, and normal participants aged 17 to 24 years with high aversive sensitivity showed higher attentional bias to all stimuli, suggesting that it was more difficult to disengage from disgust than from fear. In a study by Cisler et al (2009) where the rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm was used, normal participants aged 18 to 21 years were found to have more difficulty in attentional disengagement from aversive words.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%