2021
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1907375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is acute lymphoblastic leukemia with mature B-cell phenotype and KMT2A rearrangements a new entity? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differing stages of arrested B-lineage differentiation may be attributable to the different instructive capabilities of different KMT2A fusions, as suggested by a reported model system 30 , in which genetically concordant human CB HSPCs were transformed into pro-B and pre-B-ALL by KMT2A-Aff1 and KMT2A-MLLT3 , respectively. A recent case review reporting the recurrent KMT2A-MLLT3 rearrangement in extremely rare mature B-ALL patients 38 also suggests an instructive preference of KMT2A-MLLT3 for B-lineage maturation. In addition, two recent DNA methylation profiling studies demonstrated relatively similar methylation profiles between KMT2A-MLLT3 and KMT2A -germline infants 39 , 40 , which may be due to the common pre-B state of KMT2A-MLLT3 and KMT2A -germline infant ALL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The differing stages of arrested B-lineage differentiation may be attributable to the different instructive capabilities of different KMT2A fusions, as suggested by a reported model system 30 , in which genetically concordant human CB HSPCs were transformed into pro-B and pre-B-ALL by KMT2A-Aff1 and KMT2A-MLLT3 , respectively. A recent case review reporting the recurrent KMT2A-MLLT3 rearrangement in extremely rare mature B-ALL patients 38 also suggests an instructive preference of KMT2A-MLLT3 for B-lineage maturation. In addition, two recent DNA methylation profiling studies demonstrated relatively similar methylation profiles between KMT2A-MLLT3 and KMT2A -germline infants 39 , 40 , which may be due to the common pre-B state of KMT2A-MLLT3 and KMT2A -germline infant ALL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, the fusion score of BCR-ABL1 in 10 of 14 patients with CML was >0.74 ( Figure 7 E), and its fusion score in most CML cell line samples was >0.90 ( Figure 7 F). The fusion gene KMT2A-AFF1 , which was previously reported to be related to poor prognosis of pro–B-ALL 48 and occurred in subtype 4 or subtype 5 AML, was detected in 22 of 28 (78.6%) of samples of SEM (pro–B-ALL cell line) and 9 of 16 (56.3%) of samples in MV4-11 (subtype 5 AML cell line; Figure 7 G). Notably, the average fusion scores of KMT2A-AFF1 were >0.9 in SEM and MV4-11 cell lines ( Figure 7 H-I).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In addition, the fusion score of BCR-ABL1 in 10 of 14 CML patients was greater than 0.74 (Figure 7E), and its fusion score in most CML cell line samples was greater than 0.90 (Figure 7F). The fusion gene KMT2A-AFF1, which was previously reported to be related to poor prognosis of Pro-B-ALL 48 and occurred in M4 or M5 AML, was detected in 78.6% (22/28) samples of SEM (Pro-B-ALL cell line) and 56.3% (9/16) samples in MV4-11 (M5 AML cell line;…”
Section: Landscape Of Fusion Genes In Leukemia Subtypes and Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, co‐occurring CRLF2 ‐R or other BCR::ABL1 ‐like genetic abnormality does not appear to explain the few non‐ BCR::ABL1 +/like cases with IGJ+ staining. UH‐072 differed from the other KMT2A ‐R cases in lacking the characteristic CD10−, CD15+ phenotype of most KMT2A ‐R B‐ALL 37 and instead having a mature immunophenotype (Tdt‐, CD34−, CD20+, dim surface lambda light chain) as described in a minority of KMT2A ‐R B‐ALL cases 38–41 . No distinguishing features were seen between the IGJ+ and the respective IGJ− ETV6::RUNX1 and NFS cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…UH-072 differed from the other KMT2A-R cases in lacking the characteristic CD10−, CD15+ phenotype of most KMT2A-R B-ALL 37 and instead having a mature immunophenotype (Tdt-, CD34−, CD20+, dim surface lambda light chain) as described in a minority of KMT2A-R B-ALL cases. [38][39][40][41] No distinguishing features were seen between the IGJ+ and the respective IGJ− ETV6::RUNX1 and NFS cases. We also did not identify any unifying features in IGJ+ non-BCR::ABL1+/like cases or between these cases and the BCR::ABL1+/like cases.…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 Variable Expression Of Igj Protein Inmentioning
confidence: 93%