2011
DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2011.17.3.330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Alacrima So Prevalent in Patients With Early-Onset Achalasia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some case reports have shown that decreased tear production was either present from birth or was noted within the first year of life 5,9. In addition, various cases and reports have studied the prevalence of alacrima with relation to achalasia, as achalasia is an extremely rare finding in infancy 37. It was found that alacrima can be as high as 42% in patients with early-onset achalasia 37…”
Section: Alacrimamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some case reports have shown that decreased tear production was either present from birth or was noted within the first year of life 5,9. In addition, various cases and reports have studied the prevalence of alacrima with relation to achalasia, as achalasia is an extremely rare finding in infancy 37. It was found that alacrima can be as high as 42% in patients with early-onset achalasia 37…”
Section: Alacrimamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, various cases and reports have studied the prevalence of alacrima with relation to achalasia, as achalasia is an extremely rare finding in infancy 37. It was found that alacrima can be as high as 42% in patients with early-onset achalasia 37…”
Section: Alacrimamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our article, we chose a broad cut-off value of less than 10 mm/5 min which is used widely, because we wanted to enroll as many patients as possible for our study 6,7. With the narrow cut-off value of less than 5 mm/5 min, the prevalence of alacrima was 26.3% (5 out of 19 enrolled patients), lower than that in our original article.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%