2022
DOI: 10.1037/cou0000627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is alliance therapeutic in itself? It depends.

Abstract: The alliance has been a leading player in the long-running debate on whether therapeutic change is driven by factors common across distinct treatments or by treatment-specific factors. The present study disentangled between-patients differences in alliance strength from within-patient changes to investigate whether two treatments with identical goals but based on different roles of alliance differ in the within-patient effect of alliance on outcome. Both treatments are aimed at improving the patients’ interper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, one could speculate that the improvement in well-being noted among patients of untrained therapists was not specifically associated with the alliance but might have been associated with some other specific therapeutic factor. This is consistent with a recent study by Zilcha-Mano and Ben David-Sela (2022) in which a treatment that relied on the therapeutic relationship as the primary change agent resulted in better outcomes when the alliance improved in a previous session. However, an increase in the alliance was not related to next session outcomes for a treatment that relied primarily on specific therapeutic interventions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Conversely, one could speculate that the improvement in well-being noted among patients of untrained therapists was not specifically associated with the alliance but might have been associated with some other specific therapeutic factor. This is consistent with a recent study by Zilcha-Mano and Ben David-Sela (2022) in which a treatment that relied on the therapeutic relationship as the primary change agent resulted in better outcomes when the alliance improved in a previous session. However, an increase in the alliance was not related to next session outcomes for a treatment that relied primarily on specific therapeutic interventions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The findings of this study might have several theoretical and clinical implications. First, this study supports the notion that common factors and specific change processes are highly interdependent, a notion stressed in authoritative models of psychotherapeutic change (see Wampold & Imel, 2015; Zilcha-Mano & Ben David-Sela, 2022). Further, this study supports an existing notion that different aspects of the therapeutic relationship might be at work depending on whether one focuses on building emotional capacity (i.e., emotional clarity) or attempts to target a cognitive process that regards behavior (i.e., rumination).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Effectiveness of RS or PS might also be due to factors not assessed in the present study, such as the relationship between the intervener and the parent, parents’ subjective level of felt security during savoring, or the emotions or levels of physiological arousal parents experience during the savoring. These factors are known to differ among therapists or participants and to predict therapy outcomes (Borelli et al., 2019; Zilcha‐Mano & Ben David‐Sela, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%