2015
DOI: 10.1186/cc14227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is an inotrope score a predictor of mortality and morbidity in children with septic shock?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inotropic scores at 24 hours and 48 hours can be independent predictors of mortality in critically ill pediatric patients with septic shock. (18) VIS value at 48 hours in this study can predict mortality if it is equal or more than 11 with 74.4% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Children with sepsis having VIS 48 hours cut-off at ≥11 were at 1.99 times greater risk of mortality (95% CI 1.25-3.19) than patients with VIS value less than 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Inotropic scores at 24 hours and 48 hours can be independent predictors of mortality in critically ill pediatric patients with septic shock. (18) VIS value at 48 hours in this study can predict mortality if it is equal or more than 11 with 74.4% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Children with sepsis having VIS 48 hours cut-off at ≥11 were at 1.99 times greater risk of mortality (95% CI 1.25-3.19) than patients with VIS value less than 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…En la actualidad dicho score se ha utilizado como predictor de mortalidad y se ha intentado validar en varios estudios 99---101 . Existen pocos estudios publicados en pacientes con choque séptico y estos concluyen que un Score inotrópico mayor de 20 se considera alto y se asocia con mayores complicaciones asociadas al uso de vasopresores e inotrópicos 100,101 (tabla 2).…”
Section: Score Inotrópicounclassified
“… At the same time, lack of a stratified presentation so as to what amounts to a low, moderate or a high inotropic dose, adds to the contextual ambiguity. Alternatively, the authors could have incorporated any of the described versions of inotropic scoring systems to assist the stratification of hemodynamic support [5] . In addition, chest X-Ray or CT Scan based component ‘D’, signifying damage to the lungs (graded as none-minimal, moderate or severe) is also far from objective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, lack of a stratified presentation so as to what amounts to a low, moderate or a high inotropic dose, adds to the contextual ambiguity. Alternatively, the authors could have incorporated any of the described versions of inotropic scoring systems to assist the stratification of hemodynamic support [5] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%