2006
DOI: 10.1080/09638280500167712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is automaticity of walking regained after stroke?

Abstract: Community dwelling stroke subjects display the same level of automaticity of walking as elderly controls, but both elderly controls and stroke subjects are less automated than young controls.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
53
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15] They found different effects on gait parameters when patients walked and simultaneously performed a cognitive task, including slower gait speed, 12 reduced cadence, longer stride duration, and increased double-limb support. 11,15 In a neurologic population, DT-related gait decrements showed to be significantly correlated with the patients' functional independence (Barthel Index) score, rather than with one of the standardly used gait measures, being the ten-meter walk time.…”
Section: Archives Of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15] They found different effects on gait parameters when patients walked and simultaneously performed a cognitive task, including slower gait speed, 12 reduced cadence, longer stride duration, and increased double-limb support. 11,15 In a neurologic population, DT-related gait decrements showed to be significantly correlated with the patients' functional independence (Barthel Index) score, rather than with one of the standardly used gait measures, being the ten-meter walk time.…”
Section: Archives Of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimuli were presented using a cassette recorder at three-second intervals in random order to prevent anticipation 10 . The third condition was walking during both tasks (triple) in which participants were required to perform both the manual and cognitive task without spilling the water in the dual-manual task, and making no errors in the dual-cognitive task 9 . In order to detect the decrement of walking speed under the aforementioned conditions, the average speed of walking under the three conditions as a percentage (%) of participants' comfortable walking speed was calculated.…”
Section: Walking Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were asked to walk 10 meters as previously under three additional conditions. The first condition was walking during a concurrent manual task (dual-manual) in which participants were required to walk while carrying (using their intact hand) a polystyrene cup of water, filled to within 7 mm of the top without spilling the water 9 . The second condition was walking during a concurrent cognitive task (dualcognitive) in which participants were required to give a correct verbal response on hearing an verbal stimulus: "yes" when they heard the word "red", and "no" when they heard the word "blue".…”
Section: Walking Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SWWT test shows good specificity (95%) and acceptable positive predictive values (83%) along with negative predictive values (76%) with moderate sensitivity (48%) in the prediction of falls [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%