2010
DOI: 10.1515/jpem.2010.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is BaF3 Bioassay Useful to Identify Patients with Bioinactive Growth Hormone?

Abstract: We analyzed the ability of the BaF3 cell line bioassay to select patients with biologically inactive GH. We first evaluated the biological response of the Ba/F3-hGHR cells to rhGH additional doses from 10 to 5000 pg/ml. The concentration points corresponding to the linear part of the curve were selected. We then analyzed a group of sera, diluted like the standard, including the entire range of GH concentrations that can be analyzed by bioassay. The serum/standard area below the curve ratio was calculated. Seru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). This close correlation has also been reported for the Ba/F3/GHR cell proliferation assay (23) although a recent study (24) reported that the correlation was not so good for the same assay; however, several reports concerning the ESTA bioassay showed that the bioactivity of GH at the secretory peak as obtained by the GH provocation test tended to be greater than the immunoreactivity (24,(29)(30)(31). The discrepancy between the bioactivity and immunoreactivity values in the ESTA assay may be due to transient changes in the distribution of different GH isoforms present in the circulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4). This close correlation has also been reported for the Ba/F3/GHR cell proliferation assay (23) although a recent study (24) reported that the correlation was not so good for the same assay; however, several reports concerning the ESTA bioassay showed that the bioactivity of GH at the secretory peak as obtained by the GH provocation test tended to be greater than the immunoreactivity (24,(29)(30)(31). The discrepancy between the bioactivity and immunoreactivity values in the ESTA assay may be due to transient changes in the distribution of different GH isoforms present in the circulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, for detection limits lower than 1 ng/ml, they have poor sensitivity, leading to concerns regarding the quantification of the actual somatogenic activity of human serum samples (12). Moreover, a recent paper suggested that the Ba/F3 bioassay would not be a useful tool for identifying patients with altered forms of GH (24). The assay described here using the BaF-GM cell line was demonstrated to have the lowest detection limit thus far, with a detection limit of approximately 0.02 ng/ml for human serum samples, i.e., over 50 to 100-fold more sensitive than the abovementioned recent cell proliferation bioassay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%