2016
DOI: 10.1111/edt.12295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is caries a risk factor for dental trauma? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: -Background/aim: The association between trauma and caries is still controversial in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible association between caries and dental trauma through a systematic review with meta-analysis. Design: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Lilacs, BBO, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Open Grey databases. The MeSH terms used were 'Tooth injuries', 'Tooth fractures', 'Tooth avulsion', 'Tooth movement'; 'Dental caries'; 'DMF index'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fowkes and Fulton contain guidelines that provide a standardized approach to quality assessment in cross‐sectional, case‐control, and cohort studies. This tool has been efficiently used in dentistry systematic reviews . All studies included in this meta‐analysis received a “no problem” classification in the summary questions related to presence of bias, confounding factors, and results occurred by chance, showing their good methodological quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fowkes and Fulton contain guidelines that provide a standardized approach to quality assessment in cross‐sectional, case‐control, and cohort studies. This tool has been efficiently used in dentistry systematic reviews . All studies included in this meta‐analysis received a “no problem” classification in the summary questions related to presence of bias, confounding factors, and results occurred by chance, showing their good methodological quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This tool has been efficiently used in dentistry systematic reviews. 25,26 All studies included in this meta-analysis received a "no problem" classification in the summary questions related to presence of bias, confounding factors, and results occurred by chance, showing their good methodological quality. Besides that, the evidence was classified as moderate, which means that the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dental caries can have serious and lasting complications. A recent report demonstrated a positive association between dental trauma and dental caries in permanent teeth [26]. Nicotine also enhances Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and biofilm metabolic activity, increasing the development of caries [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex, age, monthly household income, and dental caries experience were used as confounding variables in the adjusted model, independently of the P ‐value in the crude analysis. The confounding variables used in this study were selected on the basis of previous literature . A P ‐value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%