2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12042-020-09255-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) a Climate “Smart” Crop? A Review in the Context of Bridging Future Food Demand Gap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to cope with the negative impact of climate changes and need to increase food production, there is an urgency to develop new climate-smart crops that fit into the climate-smart agriculture approach [3][4][5]. The development of such crops can be done using genetic engineering and breeding as well by exploiting epigenetic variations [6,7]. However, this requires detailed knowledge about the molecular mechanisms that underlie the various stress responses [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to cope with the negative impact of climate changes and need to increase food production, there is an urgency to develop new climate-smart crops that fit into the climate-smart agriculture approach [3][4][5]. The development of such crops can be done using genetic engineering and breeding as well by exploiting epigenetic variations [6,7]. However, this requires detailed knowledge about the molecular mechanisms that underlie the various stress responses [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also an important industrial crop reliably providing raw material for the starch, animal feed and ethanol industries. Predictions suggest that as result of climate change, cassava cultivation will expand in the years to come (Ceballos et al ., 2011; Mbanasor et al ., 2015; Pushpalatha and Gangadharan, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, 258 documents were excluded after scrutiny of full-texts. These also include 52 reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Abegunde et al, 2019;Agrawal et al, 2014;Belhabib et al, 2016;Biazin et al, 2012;Botha et al, 2020;Brown et al, 2011;Cairns et al, 2012;Carr et al, 2020;Chuku & Okoye, 2009;Corbeels et al, 2019;Druyan, 2011;Epule et al, 2014;Forabosco et al, 2017;Gautier et al, 2016;Gil et al, 2017;Hansen et al, 2011;Hassen et al, 2017;Islam et al, 2016;Katikiro & Macusi, 2012;Kim et al, 2016;Koubi, 2019;Lahive et al, 2019;Lal, 2019;Loboguerrero et al, 2019;Makate, 2019;Mbow et al, 2014;Mngumi, 2020;Muchuru & Nhamo, 2019;Müller, 2013;Muller et al, 2011;Mundia et al, 2019;Mutuo et al, 2005;Nkiaka et al, 2019;Nkrumah, 2019;Partey et al, 2018;Powlson et al, 2016;Pushpalatha & Gangadharan, 2020; Ramirez-Villegas & Challinor, 2012;Rhodes & Atewamba, 2019;Roudier et al, 2011;…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change affects particularly smallholder farmers (Boillat et al, 2019;Descheemaeker et al, 2016;FAO, 2016;García de Jalón et al, 2018;Gbegbelegbe et al, 2018;Lalou et al, 2019;Odame Appiah et al, 2018;Oluwatayo, 2019;Williams et al, 2018). The impacts of climate change on agriculture consists in the reduction of the production and yields of staple crops such as maize (Bedeke et al, 2020;Davenport et al, 2018;Epule et al, 2017;Faye et al, 2018;Parkes et al, 2018;Srivastava et al, 2018;Tesfaye et al, 2015;Waha, Müller, & Rolinski, 2013), wheat (Trnka et al, 2019), rice (Akinbile et al, 2015;Daccache et al, 2015;Terdoo & Feola, 2016;van Oort & Zwart, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019), cassava (Jarvis et al, 2012;Pushpalatha & Gangadharan, 2020;, sorghum (Akinseye et al, 2020;Elagib et al, 2019;Faye et al, 2018;Mishra et al, 2008;Sultan et al, 2014), millet (Sultan et al, 2013). While most of the studies on the relationships between climate change and agriculture have focused on crop production, especially staple crops, a growing body of research deals with climate change impacts on livestock (Brandt et al, 2018(Brandt et al, , 2020Forabosco et al, 2017;Gerssen-Gondelach et al, 2017;Godber & Wall, 2014...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%