1986
DOI: 10.1080/03115518608619162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is cephalopod septal strength index an index of cephalopod septal strength?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it is not yet entirely clear whether Nautilus shell has flooded chambers in the egg, it would be rash to enter the debate staged by Chamberlain & Chamberlain (1986). In contrast to juvenile and adolescent septa, embryonic septal spacing and thickness do not fit the optimization originally calculated for growing phragmocone (Westermann, 1977;fig.…”
Section: Embryogenesismentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since it is not yet entirely clear whether Nautilus shell has flooded chambers in the egg, it would be rash to enter the debate staged by Chamberlain & Chamberlain (1986). In contrast to juvenile and adolescent septa, embryonic septal spacing and thickness do not fit the optimization originally calculated for growing phragmocone (Westermann, 1977;fig.…”
Section: Embryogenesismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Since septal thickness and curvature radius increase at the same rate, isometry and the strength index are maintained and buoyancy remains constant (Westermann, 1977). No allometry of septal thickness is required as alleged by Chamberlain & Chamberlain (1986). Both the ALCHERINGA NAUTILOID SEPTAL STRENGTH 125 thickness and the curvature radii are linked to undetermined external environmental controls causing illustrated variation in laboratory Nautilus (Spaeth & Hoefs, 1986).…”
Section: Juvenile Stagesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations