Is Content Really King? An Objective Analysis of the Public's Response to Medical Videos on YouTube

Abstract

Medical educators and patients are turning to YouTube to teach and learn about medical conditions. These videos are from authors whose credibility cannot be verified & are not peer reviewed. As a result, studies that have analyzed the educational content of YouTube have reported dismal results. These studies have been unable to exclude videos created by questionable sources and for non-educational purposes. We hypothesize that medical education YouTube videos, authored by credible sources, are of high educational value and appropriately suited to educate the public. Credible videos about cardiovascular diseases were identified using the Mayo Clinic's Center for Social Media Health network. Content in each video was assessed by the presence/absence of 7 factors. Each video was also evaluated for understandability using the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM). User engagement measurements were obtained for each video. A total of 607 videos (35 hours) were analyzed. Half of all videos contained 3 educational factors: treatment, screening, or prevention. There was no difference between the number of educational factors present & any user engagement measurement (p NS). SAM scores were higher in videos whose content discussed more educational factors (p<0.0001). However, none of the user engagement measurements correlated with higher SAM scores. Videos with greater educational content are more suitable for patient education but unable to engage users more than lower quality videos. It is unclear if the notion “content is king” applies to medical videos authored by credible organizations for the purposes of patient education on YouTube.

Dental trauma in social media—Analysis of Facebook content and public engagement

“…[1][2][3][4] Facebook has persisted as the most popular platform of social media. [1][2][3][4] Facebook has persisted as the most popular platform of social media.…”

“…[1][2][3][4] Seeking healthcare information on social media is the third most common online activity, 5 and more than 80% of online users browse the Internet for medical support and knowledge. [1][2][3][4] Seeking healthcare information on social media is the third most common online activity, 5 and more than 80% of online users browse the Internet for medical support and knowledge.…”

“…

The growing presence of social media websites, such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, blogs, and YouTube in health care, is well recognized. [1][2][3][4] Seeking healthcare information on social media is the third most common online activity, 5 and more than 80% of online users browse the Internet for medical support and knowledge. 6 Social media is an attractive platform for seeking healthcarerelated information because it allows for public engagement where users can share their personal experience and express their own views.

…”

YouTube™ as a source for patient education about the management of dental avulsion injuries

“…As described by similar previous studies, the majority of YouTube ™ users scan the first 30 videos several thousand times per day. Therefore, only videos appearing on the first three pages (ie the first 60 videos) 21 were included per term searched. In addition, each video was assessed for completeness using a proforma described in Table 1.…”

Patient Education in Home Care

“…Not only are patients finding information on various Web sites, but they are increasingly using YouTube to learn about medical conditions (Desai et al, 2013). However, most YouTube videos are not peer reviewed; they may not communicate balanced information; and similar to Web sites the information may not be accurate or from a credible source (Stamelou et al, 2011;Steinberg et al, 2010).…”