2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is deer herbivory directly proportional to deer population density? Comparison of deer feeding frequencies among six forests with different deer density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Management, therefore, is based on subjective perceptions of abundance, deer condition, or on impact levels (e.g., Morellet et al 2007, Mysterud et al 2010. However, as impacts are context-dependent and nonlinearly related to densities (Koda and Fujita 2011, Putman et al 2011, their assessment does not translate readily into cull targets. When deer numbers are unknown, reducing impacts may require progressive increases in the annual numbers killed and is further hindered by slow ecosystem recovery (e.g., Tanentzap et al 2009Tanentzap et al , 2011.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management, therefore, is based on subjective perceptions of abundance, deer condition, or on impact levels (e.g., Morellet et al 2007, Mysterud et al 2010. However, as impacts are context-dependent and nonlinearly related to densities (Koda and Fujita 2011, Putman et al 2011, their assessment does not translate readily into cull targets. When deer numbers are unknown, reducing impacts may require progressive increases in the annual numbers killed and is further hindered by slow ecosystem recovery (e.g., Tanentzap et al 2009Tanentzap et al , 2011.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Lampretch (1990) reported an average of 72 000 Nha -1 for Venezuelan cloud forests seedlings (0.3-1.5 m tall) and for saplings (1.3 m tall to DBH<10cm) reported 4900 Nha -1 . The lower regeneration found on Isla del Coco can be explained by the homogeneity, the appearance of predators, little ability to persist under shade, litter and soil disturbance and effects of herbivory (Lampretch, 1990;Nascimento, & Proctor, 1997;Koda, & Fujita, 2011). Sacoglottis holdridgei reported low regeneration values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverted J model has been reported as an indicator of population status (Lampretch, 1990;Koda, & Fujita, 2011). An important aspect to highlight in S. holdridgei is that, from the low saplings to larger diameter classes, the population curve for abundance tends to be coupled to the inverted J model observed for the forest (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Debarking was shown to depend on the size of trees (e.g., Nagaike and Hayashi 2003;Koda and Fujita 2011;Borkowski and Ukalski 2012), their species (e.g., Kay 1993;Akashi and Nakashizuka 1999;Moore et al 1999;Takeuchi et al 2011), proportion of coniferous stands (Ligot et al 2013), the distance from forest road (McLaren et al 2000), and snow depth (Iijima and Nagaike 2015). In addition to these factors, spatial variation of deer impact was observed in lower elevation forests: the higher the deer density, the higher the proportion of debarked trees (Iijima and Nagaike 2015) and browsed saplings (Akashi et al 2011) and the lower the sapling density (Beguin et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%