2018
DOI: 10.1177/1479164118769530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is diabetes a marker of higher risk after carotid revascularization? Experience from a single centre

Abstract: Purpose: This single centre study investigates the influence of diabetes mellitus on outcomes following carotid artery endarterectomy or stenting. Methods: In total, 752 carotid revascularizations (58.2% carotid artery stenting and 41.8% carotid endarterectomy) were performed in 221 (29.4%) patients with diabetes and 532 (70.6%) patients without diabetes. The study outcomes were death, disabling and non-disabling stroke, transient ischaemic attack and restenosis within 36 months after the procedure. Results: P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this hypothesis comes from studies published more than 10 years ago, and it must be acknowledged that in the meantime, progress has been made in terms of endovascular treatment tools and new antiplatelet agents. Only Casana's study was published in 2018, showing the same trend, increased early periprocedural risk, but no further additional risk during longer term follow-up in the diabetic population undergoing CAS [ 23 ]. Restenosis rates reported by Casana et al were also significantly higher among patients with diabetes (21.2% diabetes vs. 12.5% no diabetes at 36-months follow-up).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this hypothesis comes from studies published more than 10 years ago, and it must be acknowledged that in the meantime, progress has been made in terms of endovascular treatment tools and new antiplatelet agents. Only Casana's study was published in 2018, showing the same trend, increased early periprocedural risk, but no further additional risk during longer term follow-up in the diabetic population undergoing CAS [ 23 ]. Restenosis rates reported by Casana et al were also significantly higher among patients with diabetes (21.2% diabetes vs. 12.5% no diabetes at 36-months follow-up).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this hypothesis comes from studies published more than 10 years ago, and it must be acknowledged that in the meantime, progress has been made in terms of endovascular treatment tools and new antiplatelet agents. Only Casana's study was published in 2018, showing the same trend, increased early periprocedural risk, but no further additional risk during longer term follow-up in the diabetic population undergoing CAS [23]. Restenosis rates reported by Casana et al were also significantly higher among patients with diabetes (21.2% diabetes vs. 12.5% no diabetes at 36-months followup).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to identify patients with an increased risk of postoperative complications, which would enable adequate selection of those who will undergo surgery [3]. The available literature describes that risk factors for postoperative complications after CEA are most often related to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), the presence of other diseases, especially diabetes, the degree of stenosis and plaque characteristics, type of surgery, and anesthesia [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%