2022
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is donor-recipient sex associated with transfusion-related outcomes in critically ill patients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed previously described differences between female and male donors in PZP levels, which is in line with several previous publications that PZP plasma levels are a proxy for sex 15,22,23 . This may be important in the context of sex‐related factors in blood product transfusions 24–26 . In this study, we also show that circulating plasma protein levels correlate with other blood count parameters (e.g., WBC and LBP).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also observed previously described differences between female and male donors in PZP levels, which is in line with several previous publications that PZP plasma levels are a proxy for sex 15,22,23 . This may be important in the context of sex‐related factors in blood product transfusions 24–26 . In this study, we also show that circulating plasma protein levels correlate with other blood count parameters (e.g., WBC and LBP).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…15,22,23 This may be important in the context of sex-related factors in blood product transfusions. [24][25][26] In this study, we also show that circulating plasma protein levels correlate with other blood count parameters (e.g., WBC and LBP). Furthermore, we observed individual plasma protein signatures which are related to the immunological status, including donor-specific immunoglobulin D levels (Figure 2B).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Wood and Morton 1 express their opinion that the interpretation of the data in our article is misleading and should not be used to guide patient care. They argue that analyses of much larger databases have not found an association between donor sex and mortality and that the much smaller cohort in our study is therefore not of any further value.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%