2002
DOI: 10.1136/heart.87.4.336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Doppler tissue velocity during early left ventricular filling preload independent?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25] In this study, the mitral inflow parameters were changed after HD, which is very consistent with previous studies. 26 Although the E' velocity was unchanged in some earlier studies that used sublingual nitroglycerin, the Valsalva maneuver or saline loading, 21,27 the E' velocity was suggested to be preload dependent by other studies.…”
Section: Conventional Variables To Evaluate Diastolic Functionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25] In this study, the mitral inflow parameters were changed after HD, which is very consistent with previous studies. 26 Although the E' velocity was unchanged in some earlier studies that used sublingual nitroglycerin, the Valsalva maneuver or saline loading, 21,27 the E' velocity was suggested to be preload dependent by other studies.…”
Section: Conventional Variables To Evaluate Diastolic Functionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In particular, the left ventricular long axis function, which predominately reflects the function of the longitudinally subendocardial and subepicardial muscle fibers, is well described by using PWTD. Furthermore, PWTD is less preload dependent and could therefore be more sensitive in detecting minor left ventricle systolic and diastolic dysfunction [17, 18]. A recent report indicates that the PWTD reproducibility and inter- and intraobserver variabilities are within acceptable limits [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefits of TDI include (a) high reproducibility and accuracy, (b) excellent feasibility even in subjects with poor 2-D echocardiograms, and (c) assessment of both regional and global LV function (Alam et al 1999;Pellerin et al 2003;Nagueh, 2003). Importantly, there is evidence to suggest it is less preload dependent that standard pulsed-wave Doppler imaging (Yalcin et al 2002;Pela et al 2004b), although this remains controversial (Firstenberg et al 2001). To date no study has utilized TDI to assess segmental LV diastolic function after prolonged endurance exercise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%