2005
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-826237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Early Endoscopy in the Emergency Room Beneficial in Patients with Bleeding Peptic Ulcer? A ”Fortuitously Controlled” Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous studies, our study showed that earlier endoscopy in GI bleeding patients leads to identification of a greater number of high risk stigmata that require therapeutic intervention [16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar to previous studies, our study showed that earlier endoscopy in GI bleeding patients leads to identification of a greater number of high risk stigmata that require therapeutic intervention [16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…4 Published data suggest that performance of endoscopy within 8 hours is associated with a higher frequency of ulcers with high-risk stigmata of bleeding, and a higher need for endoscopic therapy, when compared with later endoscopy. 3,[5][6][7] Nevertheless, these studies did not find that early endoscopy was associated with any reduction in rate of rebleeding, need for surgery, or mortality. An observational study found that among high-risk patients with need for endoscopic therapy, performance of therapeutic endoscopy within 24 hours was associated with a lower risk of rebleeding and surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Randomized controlled trials [2][3][4] and observational studies [5][6][7] have compared the outcome of endoscopy performed within 2 to 24 hours with a later endoscopy, without finding any difference in M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT mortality. Limitations of existing randomized controlled trials include insufficient inclusion of highrisk patients resulting in low mortality rates (0%-3.7%), [2][3][4] small sample sizes (n=93-325), [2][3][4] exclusion of patients with hemodynamic instability, 2 lack of use of proton pump inhibitors, 4 and lack of power calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trois essais randomisés et contrôlés et une méta-analyse n'ont pas montré de bénéfice à la réalisation plus précoce (< 12 heures) d'une EOGD pour ce qui concerne la récidive hémorragique (odds ratio [1,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. L'endoscopie très précoce pourrait toutefois s'avérer utile pour les patients à haut risque dans certains travaux [15,19,21,24].…”
Section: Hémorragie Digestive Et Patients à Haut Risqueunclassified