2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is faster better? An economic evaluation of rapid and ultra-rapid genomic testing in critically ill infants and children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Project Baby Deer, also discussed above, found that RGS in in NICUs and PICUs of five community hospitals and two children’s hospitals in Michigan was associated with $4,155 savings per child tested 82 . Three studies that evaluated URGS found median net cost savings of $17,243 per child tested 73 , 94 , 95 . Given the increasing per diem costs of care in NICUs and PICUs, it is likely that current cost savings per child tested are greater than these estimates.…”
Section: Cost and Cost Effectiveness Of Urgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Project Baby Deer, also discussed above, found that RGS in in NICUs and PICUs of five community hospitals and two children’s hospitals in Michigan was associated with $4,155 savings per child tested 82 . Three studies that evaluated URGS found median net cost savings of $17,243 per child tested 73 , 94 , 95 . Given the increasing per diem costs of care in NICUs and PICUs, it is likely that current cost savings per child tested are greater than these estimates.…”
Section: Cost and Cost Effectiveness Of Urgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analyses can be computationally intensive and time‐consuming, performing complex tasks such as implementing algorithms to align millions of reads to the three billion base pair human reference genome. Due to this complexity, it is unsurprising that processing of a single genome can take ~36 h, even on a large well‐powered compute cluster (Goranitis et al, 2022 ). Choice of software appropriate for the analysis task is key to both accuracy and run time of the pipeline, with a large number of studies published comparing software options (Chen et al, 2019 ; Hatem et al, 2013 ; Kumaran et al, 2019 ; Musich et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Challenges Surrounding Rapid Genomic Sequencing and Bioinfor...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is now unprecedented evidence to show the clinical utility of this approach and the economic healthcare advantages it offers (see also articles in this series) (Goranitis et al, 2022 ). The advances in this field have been made through technical improvements of the sequencing instruments, the use of improved bioinformatic hardware/software, and through an alignment of the disparate experts who come together in such a healthcare setting to deliver the best care possible for their patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic testing can provide significant personal utility to patients and their families, and providing this information to decision makers is key in ensuring that genomic technologies and people experiencing conditions with underlying genetic cause are not disadvantaged in resource allocation decisions [ 15 19 ]. While quantitative evidence for the value of genomic testing to patients and the public has started to emerge [ 17 20 ], and to inform health economic evaluations [ 21 , 22 ], no evidence yet exists in the context of severe speech disorders. To address this gap, this study aims to elicit preferences and value for genomic testing in severe childhood speech disorders from the perspectives of the Australian public and parents of children experiencing severe speech disorders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%