2011
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Fasting Necessary for Elective Cerebral Angiography?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After a full-text review of these 21 publications, 10 studies were finally included in the meta-analysis ( Fig. 1 , Table 1 ) [ 3 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ]. The other 11 studies were excluded for the following reasons: non-English literature (n = 2), use of oral contrast rather than intravascular injections (n = 3), review (n = 3) or systematic review (n = 1) articles, studies that only evaluated the incidence of adverse events in the fasting group (n = 1), and research reporting the merged incidence of nausea and vomiting (n = 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After a full-text review of these 21 publications, 10 studies were finally included in the meta-analysis ( Fig. 1 , Table 1 ) [ 3 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ]. The other 11 studies were excluded for the following reasons: non-English literature (n = 2), use of oral contrast rather than intravascular injections (n = 3), review (n = 3) or systematic review (n = 1) articles, studies that only evaluated the incidence of adverse events in the fasting group (n = 1), and research reporting the merged incidence of nausea and vomiting (n = 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other 11 studies were excluded for the following reasons: non-English literature (n = 2), use of oral contrast rather than intravascular injections (n = 3), review (n = 3) or systematic review (n = 1) articles, studies that only evaluated the incidence of adverse events in the fasting group (n = 1), and research reporting the merged incidence of nausea and vomiting (n = 1). Two of the included studies [ 16 17 ] reported the incidence of nausea and vomiting together as emetic complications, but we were able to calculate the incidence of nausea and vomiting separately after contacting the authors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La prevalencia de náuseas en el grupo de ayuno fue del 2.6% y en el grupo de dieta ligera del 1.3%; respecto al desenlace de vómito solo el 0.7% del grupo de dieta presentó el evento. Kwon O-K et al 26 refiere en su estudio que el grupo de ayuno mostró un 2.5% de náuseas y vómito, y en el grupo de dieta, con una comida completa, el 1.0 % tuvo náuseas y vómito; estos resultados son similares con el estudio realizado. Hamid et al 27 patients are kept nilper-os/nil-by-mouth (NPO/NBM plantea que no tuvo ningún caso de intubación orotraqueal y ni un solo caso de neumonía por aspiración.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…12 There is no evidence-based support for fasting before cardiac catheterization, especially for local anesthesia and mild sedation, and there is a lack of supportive evidence for lung aspiration in emergencies, such as percutaneous coronary intervention or brain interventions. [13][14][15] Heart disease patients may also receive poor hydration and diuretics, thereby increasing the risk of contrast dye kidney damage. 16,17 The contemporary indication for free feeding before percutaneous endovascular intervention recently received supporting concepts from leaders of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (SCAI), perhaps leaving some restrictions for large catheter sizebased and valvular procedures.…”
Section: Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%