Is fasting safe? A chart review of adverse events during medically supervised, water-only fasting

Abstract

BackgroundEvidence suggests that fasting, during which only water is consumed, results in potentially health promoting physiological effects. However, peer-reviewed research assessing the safety of water-only fasting is lacking. To address this, we conducted a chart review to describe adverse events (AEs) that occurred during medically supervised, water-only fasting.MethodsElectronic charts from patient visits to a residential medical facility from 2006 to 2011 were reviewed. Patients who were at least 21 years of age and water-only fasted for ≥2 consecutive days with a refeeding period equal to half of the fast length were included. Out of 2539 charts, 768 visits met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. AEs were abstracted from chart notes and classified according to CTCAE (v4.03) and MedDRA (v12.1) terminology. Descriptive analysis of AEs is reported.ResultsDuring the protocol period, the highest grade AE (HGAE) in 555 visits was a grade 2 event or lower, in 212 visits it was a grade 3 event, in 1 visit it was a grade 4 event, and there were no grade 5 events. There were 2 (0.002%) visits with a serious adverse event (SAE). The majority of AEs identified were mild (n = 4490, 75%) in nature and known reactions to fasting.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive analysis of AEs experienced during medically supervised, water-only fasting conducted to date. Overall, our data indicate that the majority of AEs experienced were mild to moderate and known reactions to fasting. This suggests that the protocol used in this study can be safely implemented in a medical setting with minimal risk of a SAE.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12906-018-2136-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Safety, health improvement and well-being during a 4 to 21-day fasting period in an observational study including 1422 subjects

“…A recent publication that analysed retrospectively water-only fasting data found relatively more adverse effects, e. g. nausea, presyncope, dyspepsia, vomiting and palpitations [66], which we observed only in single cases. The use of different methodologies to assess and characterise AE limits the comparison with our study, which was prospective.…”

Short-term Intermittent Fasting for Weight Loss: A Case Report

“…Instead of dismissing it as a fad and risk having the patients undergo intermittent fasting unsupervised, a clinician can discuss with the patient on the available evidence and any potential health implication. Given that supervised fasting is safe and with only mild to moderate and known reactions, should the patient persist, the clinician can consider working with the patient to study the time course, variability, and effect of the intervention in clinical practice, if time and cost permit [5]. In this way, clinicians can gain further insights to personalize weight management strategies for the patient and to mitigate any potential health risk.…”

Dietary Energy Modulation and Autophagy: Exploiting Metabolic Vulnerabilities to Starve Cancer

“…Limitations of this study include a small sample size and the lack of a non-fasted control group (Dorff et al, 2016). Importantly, the safety of completely abstaining from food for periods of 2 or more days has been demonstrated in a medically-supervised setting with the majority of cancer patients experiencing minimal adverse reactions (de Groot et al, 2015;Bauersfeld et al, 2018;Finnell et al, 2018).…”