2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4591-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is fertility-preservation safe for adult non-metastatic gynecologic rhabdomyosarcoma patients? Systematic review and pooled survival analysis of 137 patients

Abstract: While high-quality clinical trial evidence is missing, existing evidence seems to support holding back on radical surgery for selected candidates with well-defined, polypoid, superficial, embryonal cervical/endometrial RMS lesions that could be completely excised with conservative surgery; further local resections with/without radiotherapy are then warranted based on margin status. Experience on the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the conservative management of uterine RMS in adults is very limited, though … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to the recently-advocated favorable overall prognosis for gynecologic rhabdomyosarcoma. Predicting a favorable outcome is the basis for introducing fertility-sparing options and locally conservative approaches, therefore it is of the outmost importance 11…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast to the recently-advocated favorable overall prognosis for gynecologic rhabdomyosarcoma. Predicting a favorable outcome is the basis for introducing fertility-sparing options and locally conservative approaches, therefore it is of the outmost importance 11…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A conservative approach appears to be safe in women with a small (<5 cm) embryonal, resectable (IRS I) tumor with negative node at imaging. Patients with non-embryonal histology, multiple satellite lesions, deep stromal invasion, lymph node or parametrial involvement, and IRS grouping up to I should undergo a radical treatment (at least extrafascial hysterectomy) 11. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in association with radiation therapy is not supported by data in adults, and future research is highly encouraged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our patient had both cervical and uterine involvement with no evidence of parametrial invasion which necessitated a simple total hysterectomy. Lymphadenectomy is not routine and is reserved only for patients with high-risk clinical features [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Elsebaie et al, the overall 5-year survival rate is 65% [ 14 ]. Although some patients may be cured with combined surgical and adjuvant treatment, the risk of recurrence and metastatic spread remains a concern [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…evaluated 137 patients with nonmetastatic gynecologic RMS, in a systematic review. Surgery was the main approach for local control of tumor in all patients [ 13 ]. According to the suggested scheme in this study, our patient was in the high-risk group owing to a large bulky pelvic mass, heavy vaginal bleeding, and alveolar variant of RMS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%