2021
DOI: 10.3917/anso.212.0337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is France exceptionally irreligious? A comparative test of the cohort replacement theory

Abstract: While scholars have often pointed to the fact that France might be an exceptionally irreligious country, this hypothesis has not yet been tested with longitudinal data; and nor have researchers tried to account for this alleged irreligiosity. The present article tries to fill this gap in the literature by comparing France to other Catholic countries in Western Europe. To do so, we use the Church Attendance and Religious change Pooled European (CARPE) dataset, which to date is the most extensive dataset of chur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusion of the analysis is secondary. In fact, assuming the kind of S-curve process of decay in religiosity documented in Voas 2009, the model shows that cohort effects supply the best explanation, which is a conclusion broadly favored within the literature (Idler 2021;McAndrew and Richards 2020;Molteni and Biolcati 2018;Stolz, Biolcati, and Molteni 2021;Voas and Chaves 2016;Brauer 2018). But that result should be understood not as an argument for the greater importance of cohort changes so much as validation of a proof-of-concept model with almost unlimited potential for deeper exploration.…”
Section: Rationale For Using Microsimulationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The conclusion of the analysis is secondary. In fact, assuming the kind of S-curve process of decay in religiosity documented in Voas 2009, the model shows that cohort effects supply the best explanation, which is a conclusion broadly favored within the literature (Idler 2021;McAndrew and Richards 2020;Molteni and Biolcati 2018;Stolz, Biolcati, and Molteni 2021;Voas and Chaves 2016;Brauer 2018). But that result should be understood not as an argument for the greater importance of cohort changes so much as validation of a proof-of-concept model with almost unlimited potential for deeper exploration.…”
Section: Rationale For Using Microsimulationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…As mentioned, the cohort replacement perspective argues that more religious older cohorts are gradually being succeeded by less religious young cohorts (Stolz et al. 2021). In this article we are less interested in variation in the levels of religiosity between age groups than in assessing whether the predictors of our four outcomes varied between age groups/cohorts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, the parental religiosity transmission effect could be expected to vary between generations, with younger cohorts being less likely to be impacted by their parents' religiosity compared to older cohorts (Molteni and Biolcati 2023). Indeed, cohort replacement theory argues that as older generations are dying off and being succeeded by more secular younger cohorts, societies are slowly becoming less religious (Molteni and Biolcati 2023;Stolz et al 2021). Thus, we expect: H4: Catholics who belong to younger cohorts should be impacted less by parental religiosity compared to older cohorts.…”
Section: Religious Socialization Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Stolz et al (2021), Voas und Chaves (2016), Wolf (2008). 3 McClendon und Hackett (2014), Stolz et al (2020).…”
unclassified