2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8544-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is gastroscopy still a valid diagnostic tool in detecting gastric MALT lymphomas?

Abstract: Although the impact of gastroscopy as a diagnostic tool in the patients of our study was of limited value, due to the nonspecific gross pattern of gastric MALT lymphomas, it should be maintained in the diagnostic intervention of the upper GI tract pathologies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to endoscopic findings, the most common pattern of the gastric lymphoma in the pathology confirmed subgroup (positive group) and endoscopy non-suspected group was the ulcerative type. This is also consistent with several recent studies (13,16,17). Unfortunately, the main macroscopic pattern of suspected gastric lymphoma in the pathology non-suspected subgroup was the infiltrative type (49.4%) and the ulcerative type was less frequent (42.1%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With regard to endoscopic findings, the most common pattern of the gastric lymphoma in the pathology confirmed subgroup (positive group) and endoscopy non-suspected group was the ulcerative type. This is also consistent with several recent studies (13,16,17). Unfortunately, the main macroscopic pattern of suspected gastric lymphoma in the pathology non-suspected subgroup was the infiltrative type (49.4%) and the ulcerative type was less frequent (42.1%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Kelessis et al (17) reported similar results, with a sensitivity of 61% for malignancy and only 27% for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This phenomenon may be caused by the submucosal growth of the lesion, necrotic material taken during biopsy, inadequate amounts of specimen or inadvertent sampling resulting from a crush (17,20).…”
Section: The Diagnostic Sensitivity Of Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lesions are more frequent at antrum and gastric body (77%) respect to the fundus (8%), and only in 15% of cases they occur diffusely. On the whole, three main patterns could be detected using gastroscopy (Kelessis et al, 2003): 1. Ulcerative (28-85%); 2.…”
Section: Role Of Endoscopic Ultrasound In Diagnosis Of Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lógicamente, todo resultado del 100% debe interpretarse con precaución y tan sólo refleja lo obtenido en una serie concreta de pacientes. Tanto la literatura médica como nuestra experiencia acumulada muestran casos en los que han sido necesarias más de dos exploraciones para poder llegar a un diagnóstico correcto en las lesiones ulceradas, especialmente en los linfomas gástricos 20,[30][31][32] . En cualquier caso, observamos que en nuestra serie la segunda exploración sistemática mejora significativamente los resultados de la primera y, por tanto, es rentable en cuanto al beneficio clínico obtenido y se aconseja su realización.…”
Section: Article In Pressunclassified