2005
DOI: 10.3200/joeb.80.6.358-364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Grade Inflation Related to Faculty Status?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A series of reports and institutional initiatives have unfolded over the last decade or so (see, for instance: Chalmers et al 2003;Junor 2004;Percy et al 2008;May et al 2008;Kezim et al 2005). But despite this good work clearly the situation has not changed.…”
Section: Strategy Five: Engage Sessional Academicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of reports and institutional initiatives have unfolded over the last decade or so (see, for instance: Chalmers et al 2003;Junor 2004;Percy et al 2008;May et al 2008;Kezim et al 2005). But despite this good work clearly the situation has not changed.…”
Section: Strategy Five: Engage Sessional Academicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incoming GPA data was adjusted for grade inflation. Undergraduate grade inflation has been averaging approximately 0.015 per year over the past 30 years (Kezim, 2005). The difference between the average "unadjusted" and "adjusted" incoming GPA is 0.06.…”
Section: Databasementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The situation is exacerbated if the instructor is on a temporary contract. The likelihood that faculty inflate grades in an effort to buy professional security is substantiated by lower ranked and untenured faculty giving higher grades than senior faculty (Sonner 2000: see also Kezim, Pariseau, and Quinn 2005;Oleinik 2009;Filetti et al 2010;Jewell, McPherson, and Tieslau 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%