Is green infrastructure an effective climate adaptation strategy for conserving biodiversity? A case study with the great crested newt

Abstract

Context Increasing the amount of green infrastructure, defined as small-scale natural landscape elements, has been named as a climate adaptation measure for biodiversity. While green infrastructure strengthened ecological networks in some studies, it is not known whether this effect also holds under climate change, and how it compares to other landscape adaptation options. ObjectivesWe assessed landscape adaptation options under scenarios of climate change for a dispersallimited and climate-sensitive species: great crested newt, Triturus cristatus. Methods A spatially-explicit modelling framework was used to simulate newt metapopulation dynamics in a case study area in the Netherlands, under alternative spatial configurations of 500 ha to-berestored habitat. The framework incorporated weather-related effects on newt recruitment, following current and changing climate conditions. Results Mild climate change resulted in slightly higher metapopulation viability, while more severe climate change (i.e. more frequent mild winters and summer droughts) had detrimental effects on metapopulation viability. The modelling framework revealed interactions between climate and landscape configuration on newt viability. Restoration of ponds and terrestrial habitat may reduce the negative effects of climate change, but only when certain spatial requirements (habitat density, connectivity) as well as abiotic requirements (high ground water level) are met. Conclusions Landscape scenarios where habitat was added in the form of green infrastructure were not able to meet these multiple conditions, as was the case for a scenario that enlarged core areas. The approach allowed a deduction of landscape design rules that incorporated both spatial and abiotic requirements resulting in more effective climate adaptation options.Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article

Does information on the interdependence of climate adaptation measures stimulate collaboration? A case study analysis

“…The too limited role of stakeholders in translating the generic recommendations of climate adaptation into site-specific solutions has been identified as one of the key barriers for effective implementation (Brown 2002;Biesbroek et al 2013). To bridge this gap between science and practice, it has been proposed to consider adaptation measures in the context of social-ecological systems (Turner et al 2010;Adger et al 2011). Olsson et al (2010) stressed that a lack of understanding of the functioning of the natural system will result in inadequate management of natural resources.…”

Developing a biodiversity‐based indicator for large‐scale environmental assessment: a case study of proposed shale gas extraction sites in Britain

“…For example, requirements of species such as the Great Crested Newt Triturus cristatus, which is a European Protected Species listed under the Habitats Directive , do not necessarily match those of other species which might benefit from certain interventions such as development of green infrastructure (Van Teeffelen et al . ). Beyond the small subset of legally protected species, many previously widespread species are in decline; therefore, reporting on their status is important (Burns et al .…”

“…Treweek 2004), they only represent a small proportion of overall biodiversity and may not necessarily reflect spatial patterns and temporal trends in this 'wider' biodiversity (Franco et al 2009). For example, requirements of species such as the Great Crested Newt Triturus cristatus, which is a European Protected Species listed under the Habitats Directive, do not necessarily match those of other species which might benefit from certain interventions such as development of green infrastructure (Van Teeffelen et al 2015). Beyond the small subset of legally protected species, many previously widespread species are in decline; therefore, reporting on their status is important (Burns et al 2013), especially as these common species may underpin crucial ecosystem functions (Winfree et al 2015).…”

Identifying gaps in protected areas to expand integrated riverine ecosystem conservation

“…To meet increasing demands for water and energy, plans to expand water diversions and storage by developing or augmenting river‐fragmenting infrastructure projects further threaten riverine ecosystems (Perry & Praskievicz, 2017; Welsh & Endter‐Wada, 2017). These gray infrastructure responses to climate change are expected to threaten biodiversity within riverine ecosystems (Darwall et al, 2018; van Teeffelen et al, 2015), along with jeopardizing other ecosystem services, such as flood control and groundwater and sediment recharge provided by free‐flowing rivers (Harrison et al, 2016).…”

“…Free-flowing rivers, however, are threatened by increasing human water demands and climate change (Anderson & Woosley Jr, 2005;Grill et al, 2019;Vörösmarty, Green, Salisbury, & Lammers, 2000;Wu et al, 2014). Climate change is increasing temperatures, altering the hydrologic cycle, and causing more extreme disturbance events as climate zones shift (Barnett, Adam, & Lettenmaier, 2005;van Teeffelen et al, 2015). Riparian zones, while highly valued for the wide range of ecosystem services they provide, are also among the most threatened ecosystems in the United States and worldwide (Fernandes, Aguiar, & Ferreira, 2011;Helfield, Capon, Nilsson, Jansson, & Palm, 2007;Krosby et al, 2018).…”