2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2022.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is hamstrings-to-quadriceps torque ratio useful for predicting anterior cruciate ligament and hamstring injuries? A systematic and critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implementing exercises specifically targeting the hamstring musculature (e.g., Romanian deadlift, Nordic hamstring curl) may improve H/Q ratios and reduce future hamstring and/or knee injury risk. Lastly, it is important to note that previous studies more commonly use dynamic isokinetic muscle actions (e.g., 30-300°•s −1 ) to examine conventional and functional H/Q ratios and the ability of H/Q ratios to predict lower extremity injuries specifically across fire academies requires future study (45).…”
Section: Muscle Strength and Vertical Jump Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing exercises specifically targeting the hamstring musculature (e.g., Romanian deadlift, Nordic hamstring curl) may improve H/Q ratios and reduce future hamstring and/or knee injury risk. Lastly, it is important to note that previous studies more commonly use dynamic isokinetic muscle actions (e.g., 30-300°•s −1 ) to examine conventional and functional H/Q ratios and the ability of H/Q ratios to predict lower extremity injuries specifically across fire academies requires future study (45).…”
Section: Muscle Strength and Vertical Jump Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamstrings act as posterior stabilizers of the knee and weakness in this muscle group can lead to greater anterolateral translation and increased risk of ACL graft rupture or contralateral injury 60 . An H/Q ratio lower than 0.50 indicates weak hamstrings that should be strengthened (acceptable H/Q close to 0.60) before progressing to sports functional testing 61 . Athletes with weak quadriceps hop slower and for shorter distances, which leads to not passing hop test criteria 62 .…”
Section: Evidence For Isokinetic Strength Testing During Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 An H/Q ratio lower than 0.50 indicates weak hamstrings that should be strengthened (acceptable H/Q close to 0.60) before progressing to sports functional testing. 61 Athletes with weak quadriceps hop slower and for shorter distances, which leads to not passing hop test criteria. 62 As mentioned previously, an LSI ≥85-90% is considered acceptable 33,34 and we use this criterion to determine when the athlete is ready for functional testing.…”
Section: Strength Evaluation As a Screening Tool For Functional Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximal knee flexor and knee extensor strength was obtained under specific concentric and eccentric isokinetic conditions. These were selected to allow for the computation of two commonly reported H:Q ratios: a conventional H:Q ratio, and a functional H:Q ratio, which have been used in previous research (6,15,21). These ratios are typically calculated using peak joint moment but, by analysing joint moment data throughout the full isokinetic ROM, we were able to compare the discrete calculations of H:Q ratio to a range of angle-specific strength ratios as independent variables, thus allowing us to establish the ability of discrete ratios to represent strength ratios throughout the full joint ROM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where conventional H:Q ratio is determined by measuring the peak joint moment of the hamstrings and quadriceps during concentric actions, the functional H:Q ratio is determined by measuring the peak moment of the quadriceps during concentric action and the hamstrings peak moment during eccentric action, as would be observed during running or kicking (1). Despite literature commonly reporting these values, there remains uncertainty regarding their relevance to human movement (21). The widely accepted "optimal" conventional H:Q ratio is 0.6 (i.e., the peak joint moment of the hamstrings is 60% of the quadriceps).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%